> Yes, Compiler will remove it but this looks ugly and confusing.
>
> Why dont we use like this :-
Even more fugly.
> # ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
> # include
> # endif
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
> preempt_disable();
> #endif
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
> preempt_enable();
> #endif
>
-`J'
--
-
Jaswinder Singh wrote:
On 12/5/06, Michal Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jaswinder Singh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> preempt stuff SHOULD only stay in #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMP_* , but it is
> messing with everyone even though not defined.
>
> e.g.
>
> 1. linux-2.6.19/kernel/spinlock.c
>
> Line 18: #include
Jaswinder Singh skrev:
Yes, Compiler will remove it but this looks ugly and confusing.
Why dont we use like this :-
#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
#include
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
preempt_disable();
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
preempt_enable();
#endif
Surely you're joking.
It is much more r
On 12/5/06, Michal Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jaswinder Singh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> preempt stuff SHOULD only stay in #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMP_* , but it is
> messing with everyone even though not defined.
>
> e.g.
>
> 1. linux-2.6.19/kernel/spinlock.c
>
> Line 18: #include
>
> Line 26: preempt_
Jaswinder Singh wrote:
Hi,
preempt stuff SHOULD only stay in #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMP_* , but it is
messing with everyone even though not defined.
e.g.
1. linux-2.6.19/kernel/spinlock.c
Line 18: #include
Line 26: preempt_disable();
Line 32: preempt_disable();
and so on .
Don't worry. Thes
5 matches
Mail list logo