(2013/02/21 17:34), Glauber Costa wrote:
On 02/21/2013 03:00 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
(cc'ing cgroup / memcg people and quoting whole body)
Looks like something is going wrong with memcg cache destruction.
Glauber, any ideas? Also, can we please not use names as generic as
kmem_cache_destroy_work_
On 02/21/2013 03:22 PM, Glauber Costa wrote:
> On 02/21/2013 03:00 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> (cc'ing cgroup / memcg people and quoting whole body)
>>
>> Looks like something is going wrong with memcg cache destruction.
>> Glauber, any ideas? Also, can we please not use names as generic as
>> kmem_ca
On 02/21/2013 03:00 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> (cc'ing cgroup / memcg people and quoting whole body)
>
> Looks like something is going wrong with memcg cache destruction.
> Glauber, any ideas? Also, can we please not use names as generic as
> kmem_cache_destroy_work_func for something specific to mem
On 02/21/2013 03:00 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> (cc'ing cgroup / memcg people and quoting whole body)
>
> Looks like something is going wrong with memcg cache destruction.
> Glauber, any ideas? Also, can we please not use names as generic as
> kmem_cache_destroy_work_func for something specific to mem
4 matches
Mail list logo
