Hi Hannes,
Sorry to bother you.
Months ago, you made a patch to fix this scsi_scan abort error found on
zfssa storage. Though it's only a specific storage, the logic -- not
abort scsi scan process because of an inquiry failure of a LU in the
middle, is helpful as a way to make our scanning more re
On 2013年10月21日 14:07, vaughan wrote:
On 10/16/2013 02:52 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
But seeing that this approach raises quite some issues I've attached a
different patch. Vaughan, could you test with that, too? Should be
functionally equivalent to the previous one. Cheers, Hannes
Hi Hannes,
On 10/21/2013 08:07 AM, vaughan wrote:
On 10/16/2013 02:52 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
But seeing that this approach raises quite some issues I've attached a
different patch. Vaughan, could you test with that, too? Should be
functionally equivalent to the previous one. Cheers, Hannes
Hi Hannes,
On 10/16/2013 02:52 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> But seeing that this approach raises quite some issues I've attached a
> different patch. Vaughan, could you test with that, too? Should be
> functionally equivalent to the previous one. Cheers, Hannes
Hi Hannes,
We only tested the later patch whic
On 10/16/2013 02:52 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> But seeing that this approach raises quite some issues I've attached a
> different patch. Vaughan, could you test with that, too? Should be
> functionally equivalent to the previous one. Cheers, Hannes
Of course. This one is more clear to express ou
On 10/14/2013 05:24 PM, Steffen Maier wrote:
> On 10/14/2013 03:32 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> On 10/14/2013 03:18 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>>> On 10/14/2013 02:51 PM, Steffen Maier wrote:
On 10/14/2013 01:13 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 10/13/2013 07:23 PM, Vaughan Cao wrote:
>
On 2013年10月15日 13:51, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
But that notwithstanding, did you get a chance to test my patch?
Cheers,
Hannes
Hi Hannes,
Kernel patched and waiting feedback from lab guy.
Thanks,
Vaughan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of
On 10/15/2013 05:32 AM, vaughan wrote:
> On 10/14/2013 07:13 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> In the log, inquiry to LUN7 return a sense - asc,ascq=04h,0Ch
>> (Logical unit not accessible, target port in unavailable state).
>> And this is ignored, so scsi_probe_lun() returns -EIO and the scan
>> proce
On 10/14/2013 07:13 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> In the log, inquiry to LUN7 return a sense - asc,ascq=04h,0Ch
> (Logical unit not accessible, target port in unavailable state).
> And this is ignored, so scsi_probe_lun() returns -EIO and the scan
> process is aborted.
>
> I have two questions:
> 1.
On 10/14/2013 03:32 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
On 10/14/2013 03:18 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
On 10/14/2013 02:51 PM, Steffen Maier wrote:
On 10/14/2013 01:13 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
On 10/13/2013 07:23 PM, Vaughan Cao wrote:
[1.] One line summary of the problem:
special sense code asc,asc
On 2013年10月14日 21:18, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
On 10/14/2013 02:51 PM, Steffen Maier wrote:
Hi Hannes,
On 10/14/2013 01:13 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
On 10/13/2013 07:23 PM, Vaughan Cao wrote:
Hi James,
[1.] One line summary of the problem:
special sense code asc,ascq=04h,0Ch abort scsi scan
On 10/14/2013 03:18 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 10/14/2013 02:51 PM, Steffen Maier wrote:
>> Hi Hannes,
>>
>> On 10/14/2013 01:13 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>>> On 10/13/2013 07:23 PM, Vaughan Cao wrote:
Hi James,
[1.] One line summary of the problem:
special sense code asc,
On 10/14/2013 02:51 PM, Steffen Maier wrote:
> Hi Hannes,
>
> On 10/14/2013 01:13 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> On 10/13/2013 07:23 PM, Vaughan Cao wrote:
>>> Hi James,
>>>
>>> [1.] One line summary of the problem:
>>> special sense code asc,ascq=04h,0Ch abort scsi scan in the middle
>>>
>>> [2.]
Hi Hannes,
On 10/14/2013 01:13 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 10/13/2013 07:23 PM, Vaughan Cao wrote:
>> Hi James,
>>
>> [1.] One line summary of the problem:
>> special sense code asc,ascq=04h,0Ch abort scsi scan in the middle
>>
>> [2.] Full description of the problem/report:
>> For instance, s
On 10/13/2013 07:23 PM, Vaughan Cao wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> [1.] One line summary of the problem:
> special sense code asc,ascq=04h,0Ch abort scsi scan in the middle
>
> [2.] Full description of the problem/report:
> For instance, storage represents 8 iscsi LUNs, however the LUN No.7
> is not well
15 matches
Mail list logo
