Re: Perf tests for hw events

2015-01-22 Thread Matt Fleming
On Thu, 22 Jan, at 09:59:52AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > At some point 'perf test' should grow infrastructure to specify what is > required for a test so that it auto-skips those, possibly not even > bothering the user telling something can't be tested. Right now for > things like tests

Re: Perf tests for hw events

2015-01-22 Thread Matt Fleming
On Thu, 22 Jan, at 01:56:59PM, Jiri Olsa wrote: > On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 12:40:14PM +, Matt Fleming wrote: > > Folks, > > > > In the process of writing perf support for Intel's Cache QoS Monitoring > > feature [0] I've had to write my own userland tests to drive tools/perf > > and indirectly

Re: Perf tests for hw events

2015-01-22 Thread Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Em Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 12:40:14PM +, Matt Fleming escreveu: > Folks, > > In the process of writing perf support for Intel's Cache QoS Monitoring > feature [0] I've had to write my own userland tests to drive tools/perf > and indirectly the kernel internals. I'm now getting requests for these

Re: Perf tests for hw events

2015-01-22 Thread Jiri Olsa
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 12:40:14PM +, Matt Fleming wrote: > Folks, > > In the process of writing perf support for Intel's Cache QoS Monitoring > feature [0] I've had to write my own userland tests to drive tools/perf > and indirectly the kernel internals. I'm now getting requests for these > t