On Wed 2013-05-15 23:03:35, Al Viro wrote:
> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 01:38:48PM +0100, P??draig Brady wrote:
> > >> In today's Austin Group meeting, I was tasked to open a new bug that
> > >> would state specifically how the empty symlink is resolved; the intent
> > >> is to allow both Solaris beha
Hi!
> > Following up from http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=649
> > It seems POSIX will now allow the current Linux behavior of returning
> > ENOENT,
>
> Huh? Linux currently doesn't allow the creation of an empty symlink.
> That link mentions the current BSD behavior of returning ENOENT w
On 05/15/2013 04:03 PM, Al Viro wrote:
> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 01:38:48PM +0100, P??draig Brady wrote:
In today's Austin Group meeting, I was tasked to open a new bug that
would state specifically how the empty symlink is resolved; the intent
is to allow both Solaris behavior (curr
On 05/15/2013 11:03 PM, Al Viro wrote:
> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 01:38:48PM +0100, P??draig Brady wrote:
In today's Austin Group meeting, I was tasked to open a new bug that
would state specifically how the empty symlink is resolved; the intent
is to allow both Solaris behavior (curr
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 01:38:48PM +0100, P??draig Brady wrote:
> >> In today's Austin Group meeting, I was tasked to open a new bug that
> >> would state specifically how the empty symlink is resolved; the intent
> >> is to allow both Solaris behavior (current directory) and BSD behavior
> >> (ENO
On 05/15/2013 03:40 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 05/15/2013 06:38 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
>> On 01/17/2013 04:22 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
>>> On 01/17/2013 01:03 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
The discussion leading to this is at http://bugs.gnu.org/13447
In summary other systems allow an empty
On 05/15/2013 06:38 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> On 01/17/2013 04:22 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
>> On 01/17/2013 01:03 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
>>> The discussion leading to this is at http://bugs.gnu.org/13447
>>> In summary other systems allow an empty target for a symlink,
>>> and POSIX specifies th
On 01/17/2013 04:22 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> On 01/17/2013 01:03 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
>> The discussion leading to this is at http://bugs.gnu.org/13447
>> In summary other systems allow an empty target for a symlink,
>> and POSIX specifies that it should be allowed?
>
> In relation to this,
On 01/17/2013 01:03 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
The discussion leading to this is at http://bugs.gnu.org/13447
In summary other systems allow an empty target for a symlink,
and POSIX specifies that it should be allowed?
In relation to this, Eric Blake said:
> In today's Austin Group meeting, I wa
9 matches
Mail list logo
