Re: Re: [PATCH] x86: set Pentium M as PAE capable

2014-03-04 Thread Chris Bainbridge
On 4 March 2014 17:44, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 01:06:03PM +0700, Chris Bainbridge wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 09:04:19PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >> > forcepae is descriptive. >> >> Back to forcepae. > > Ok, it looks ok to me after a quick look. Now you only have

Re: Re: [PATCH] x86: set Pentium M as PAE capable

2014-03-04 Thread Borislav Petkov
On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 01:06:03PM +0700, Chris Bainbridge wrote: > On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 09:04:19PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > forcepae is descriptive. > > Back to forcepae. Ok, it looks ok to me after a quick look. Now you only have to ask Dave whether he's fine with you merging his pat

Re: Re: [PATCH] x86: set Pentium M as PAE capable

2014-03-03 Thread Chris Bainbridge
On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 09:04:19PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > forcepae is descriptive. Back to forcepae. Signed-off-by: Chris Bainbridge --- diff --git a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt index 580a60c..67755ea 100644 --- a/Documentation/kernel-parame

Re: Re: [PATCH] x86: set Pentium M as PAE capable

2014-03-03 Thread H. Peter Anvin
forcepae is descriptive. On March 3, 2014 9:01:30 PM PST, Chris Bainbridge wrote: >On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 08:29:39PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 03:04:35PM +0700, Chris Bainbridge wrote: >> > On 3 March 2014 02:05, Roland Kletzing wrote: >> > > i would recommend ad

Re: Re: [PATCH] x86: set Pentium M as PAE capable

2014-03-03 Thread Chris Bainbridge
On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 08:29:39PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 03:04:35PM +0700, Chris Bainbridge wrote: > > On 3 March 2014 02:05, Roland Kletzing wrote: > > > i would recommend adding the newly introduced param to > > > Documentation/kernel- > > > parameters.txt , tho

Re: Re: [PATCH] x86: set Pentium M as PAE capable

2014-03-03 Thread Borislav Petkov
On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 03:04:35PM +0700, Chris Bainbridge wrote: > On 3 March 2014 02:05, Roland Kletzing wrote: > > i would recommend adding the newly introduced param to > > Documentation/kernel- > > parameters.txt , though. > > Done. > > Signed-off-by: Chris Bainbridge > --- > diff --git a/

Re: Re: [PATCH] x86: set Pentium M as PAE capable

2014-03-03 Thread Chris Bainbridge
On Sun, Mar 02, 2014 at 09:56:19PM +0100, Andreas Mohr wrote: > Hi, > > > /* > > +* PAE CPUID bug: Pentium M reports no PAE but has PAE > > +*/ > > Ain't that a tad strongly/incorrectly worded? I've updated the wording. On 3 March 2014 02:05, Roland Kletzing wrote: > i would recomm

Re: Re: [PATCH] x86: set Pentium M as PAE capable

2014-03-02 Thread Andreas Mohr
Hi, > /* > + * PAE CPUID bug: Pentium M reports no PAE but has PAE > + */ Ain't that a tad strongly/incorrectly worded? It's probably not certain whether that's a "bug". Prior content in this discussion suggested that the flag might have been intentionally not advertised, due to