Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [PATCH -tip v3 00/23] kprobes: introduce NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() and general cleaning of kprobe blacklist

(2013/11/30 22:46), Ingo Molnar wrote: Anyway, to fix all of them, I think we need file-based blacklist especially for assembler symbols. >>> >>> assembler symbols shouldn't be particular hard either, just put them >>> into the noprobes section. >> >> Would you mean .kprobes.text? Hmm, I

Re: Re: Re: Re: [PATCH -tip v3 00/23] kprobes: introduce NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() and general cleaning of kprobe blacklist

* Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > (2013/11/27 22:30), Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > * Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > > > >> (2013/11/22 11:35), Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > >>> (2013/11/21 16:29), Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > > > (2013/11/21 2:36), Frank Ch. Eigler wr

Re: Re: Re: Re: [PATCH -tip v3 00/23] kprobes: introduce NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() and general cleaning of kprobe blacklist

(2013/11/27 22:30), Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > >> (2013/11/22 11:35), Masami Hiramatsu wrote: >>> (2013/11/21 16:29), Ingo Molnar wrote: * Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > (2013/11/21 2:36), Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: [ ... ] >> one needs to resort

Re: Re: Re: [PATCH -tip v3 00/23] kprobes: introduce NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() and general cleaning of kprobe blacklist

* Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > (2013/11/22 11:35), Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > > (2013/11/21 16:29), Ingo Molnar wrote: > >> > >> * Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > >> > >>> (2013/11/21 2:36), Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: > >> > >> [ ... ] > one needs to resort to something like: > > # cat /proc/

Re: Re: Re: [PATCH -tip v3 00/23] kprobes: introduce NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() and general cleaning of kprobe blacklist

(2013/11/22 11:35), Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > (2013/11/21 16:29), Ingo Molnar wrote: >> >> * Masami Hiramatsu wrote: >> >>> (2013/11/21 2:36), Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: >> >> [ ... ] one needs to resort to something like: # cat /proc/kallsyms | grep ' [tT] ' | while read addr type sym