Re: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] perf probe: Split add_perf_probe_events()

On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 08:10:16AM +, 平松雅巳 / HIRAMATU，MASAMI wrote: > Hi Namhyung, > > From: Namhyung Kim [mailto:namhy...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Namhyung Kim > > > >Hi Masami, > > > >On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 05:00:07AM +, 平松雅巳 / HIRAMATU，MASAMI wrote: > >> >From: Namhyung Kim [mailto:namh

RE: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] perf probe: Split add_perf_probe_events()

Hi Namhyung, From: Namhyung Kim [mailto:namhy...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Namhyung Kim > >Hi Masami, > >On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 05:00:07AM +, 平松雅巳 / HIRAMATU，MASAMI wrote: >> >From: Namhyung Kim [mailto:namhy...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Namhyung Kim >> >The del_perf_probe_events() uses strfilter

Re: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] perf probe: Split add_perf_probe_events()

Hi Masami, On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 05:00:07AM +, 平松雅巳 / HIRAMATU，MASAMI wrote: > >From: Namhyung Kim [mailto:namhy...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Namhyung Kim > >The del_perf_probe_events() uses strfilter, but I think it can be > >problematic if other instances or users are using similar events at

RE: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] perf probe: Split add_perf_probe_events()

>From: Namhyung Kim [mailto:namhy...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Namhyung Kim > >On Sun, Sep 06, 2015 at 03:47:37PM +0800, Wangnan (F) wrote: >> Hi Namhyung, > >Hi, > >> >> Thanks for this patchset. >> >> Could you plase have a look at patch 5/27 and 6/27 in my newest pull >> request? >> These 2 patche