On Wed, 2013-12-11 at 16:53 -0600, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-12-11 at 22:15 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Wed, 2013-12-11 at 23:35 +0200, Ivajlo Dimitrov wrote:
> > > On 11.12.2013 23:17, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > > I think that's an even worse idea. This is not firmware and it alre
On Wed, 2013-12-11 at 22:15 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-12-11 at 23:35 +0200, Ivajlo Dimitrov wrote:
> > On 11.12.2013 23:17, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > I think that's an even worse idea. This is not firmware and it already
> > > exists in separate storage.
> > >
> > > I think that
On Wed, 2013-12-11 at 23:35 +0200, Ivajlo Dimitrov wrote:
> On 11.12.2013 23:17, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > I think that's an even worse idea. This is not firmware and it already
> > exists in separate storage.
> >
> > I think that rx51_init_wl1251() in
> > arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-peripherals
On 11.12.2013 23:17, Ben Hutchings wrote:
I think that's an even worse idea. This is not firmware and it already
exists in separate storage.
I think that rx51_init_wl1251() in
arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-peripherals.c should either copy the MAC
address out of NVRAM, or if it's too early to
4 matches
Mail list logo