Em Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 11:03:20PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 12:52:37PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > If we agreed to extend the event format, I'd like to keep it simple
> > > and to make it optional to add more info (separated by colon?).
> >
> > Readi
Hi Arnaldo,
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 12:52:37PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 04:55:19PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> > On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 01:24:53AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > > On 2015/07/23 23:01, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > > Em Thu,
Em Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 04:55:19PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 01:24:53AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > On 2015/07/23 23:01, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > Em Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 10:13:22PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
> > The following patterns we've
Hi Masami and Arnaldo,
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 01:24:53AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> On 2015/07/23 23:01, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 10:13:22PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
> >> # perf list
> >>
> >> List of pre-defined events (to be used in -e):
> >> ..
Em Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 01:24:53AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
> On 2015/07/23 23:01, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > This needs refining, i.e. I should just warn that albeit
> > "probe:vfs_getname" is available,
> > it can't be used, unless we open the doors wide.
> >
> > Sorry for the
On 2015/07/23 23:01, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 10:13:22PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
>> On 2015/07/22 23:12, Hemant Kumar wrote:
>>> On 07/17/2015 08:51 AM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
On 2015/07/16 12:13, Hemant Kumar wrote:
>>> The idea behind '%' was to id
Em Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 10:13:22PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
> On 2015/07/22 23:12, Hemant Kumar wrote:
> > On 07/17/2015 08:51 AM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> >> On 2015/07/16 12:13, Hemant Kumar wrote:
> > The idea behind '%' was to identify the SDT events and take a different path
> > to l
On 2015/07/22 23:12, Hemant Kumar wrote:
> Hi Masami,
>
> Apologies for the delayed response.
>
> On 07/17/2015 08:51 AM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>> Hi Hemant,
>>
>> On 2015/07/16 12:13, Hemant Kumar wrote:
>>> Hi Masami,
>>>
>>> On 07/15/2015 02:43 PM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
Hi,
On 2015/07/21 1:20, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hi Brendan,
>
> On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 10:47:31PM -0700, Brendan Gregg wrote:
>> G'Day Masami-san, Namhyung,
>>
>> I'm really looking forward to this feature -- very useful, thanks!...
>>
>> On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 9:24 PM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>>> Hi Mas
Hi Brendan,
On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 10:47:31PM -0700, Brendan Gregg wrote:
> G'Day Masami-san, Namhyung,
>
> I'm really looking forward to this feature -- very useful, thanks!...
>
> On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 9:24 PM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > Hi Masami,
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 12:21:42PM +
G'Day Masami-san, Namhyung,
I'm really looking forward to this feature -- very useful, thanks!...
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 9:24 PM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hi Masami,
>
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 12:21:42PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>> Now I'm thinking that we should avoid using %event syntax f
Hi Masami,
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 12:21:42PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> Now I'm thinking that we should avoid using %event syntax for perf-list
> and perf-record to avoid confusion. For example, suppose that we have
> "libfoo:bar" SDT event, when we just scanned the libfoo binary and
> use
Hi Hemant,
On 2015/07/16 12:13, Hemant Kumar wrote:
> Hi Masami,
>
> On 07/15/2015 02:43 PM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Here is the 2nd version of the patchset for probe-cache and
>> initial SDT support which are going to be perf-cache finally.
>
> Thanks for adding the SDT support.
>
13 matches
Mail list logo
