On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 07:59 -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:
> (depending on whether we want to accomodate Debian's glacial
> release schedule).
I don't think Debian updates the kernel to some actual newer version
either.
johannes
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 02:39:00PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> Ok, I only named HAL as that is what people have told me the problem is.
> I have been running this change on my boxs, without
> CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED since last July or so.
>
> But I don't use NetworkManager here for the most part, but
On Mon, 5 Mar 2007 17:17:09 -0800
Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 05:08:49PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Mon, 5 Mar 2007 19:56:25 -0500
> > Theodore Tso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > So the question really is are we really done making changes to sysfs,
>
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 05:08:49PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Mar 2007 19:56:25 -0500
> Theodore Tso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > So the question really is are we really done making changes to sysfs,
> > or maybe what we should do is talk about major version numbers to
> > sysfs.
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 07:56:25PM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 04:37:15PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > But I AM TRYING TO MAKE IT COMPATIBLE!!!
> >
> > That's what that config option is there for. If you happen to be
> > running a newer userspace, a different distro than wha
On Mon, 5 Mar 2007 19:56:25 -0500
Theodore Tso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So the question really is are we really done making changes to sysfs,
> or maybe what we should do is talk about major version numbers to
> sysfs.
Perhaps using a config option wasn't the right way to do this - a kernel
b
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 04:37:15PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> But I AM TRYING TO MAKE IT COMPATIBLE!!!
>
> That's what that config option is there for. If you happen to be
> running a newer userspace, a different distro than what is in Debian
> right now, or don't use HAL and Networkmanager, then di
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 11:24:57AM +1100, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 03:14:25PM -0600, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 04:46:09PM +0100, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> > > > That's not the point. The point is that Debian/unstable as of _this
> > > > morning_ doesn't work.
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 03:14:25PM -0600, Matt Mackall wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 04:46:09PM +0100, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> > > That's not the point. The point is that Debian/unstable as of _this
> > > morning_ doesn't work. For reference, I'm running both the latest
> > > releases of both hal
Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 07:59:50AM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:
Ok, how about the following patch. Is it acceptable to everyone?
thanks,
greg k-h
---
init/Kconfig | 13 +++--
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- gregkh-2.6.orig/init/Kconfig
+++ gre
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 01:55:30PM -0600, Matt Mackall wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 10:58:13AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > Ok, how about the following patch. Is it acceptable to everyone?
> >
> > - If you are using a distro that was released in 2006 or later,
> > - it should be safe to
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 04:46:09PM +0100, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 01:13:26AM -0600, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > That's not the point. The point is that Debian/unstable as of _this
> > morning_ doesn't work. For reference, I'm running both the latest
> > releases of both hal (0.5.8
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 04:46:09PM +0100, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> > That's not the point. The point is that Debian/unstable as of _this
> > morning_ doesn't work. For reference, I'm running both the latest
> > releases of both hal (0.5.8.1-6.1) and network-manager (0.6.4-6). And
> > there are people
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 10:58:13AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> Ok, how about the following patch. Is it acceptable to everyone?
>
> - If you are using a distro that was released in 2006 or later,
> - it should be safe to say N here.
> + If you are using an OpenSuSE, Gentoo, Ubuntu,
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 07:59:50AM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 05:17:29PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > I should not have broken any userspace if CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED is
> > enabled with that patch. If that is enabled, and that patch still
> > causes problems, please let me
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 01:13:26AM -0600, Matt Mackall wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 11:02:48PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 12:42:29AM -0600, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > > On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 05:16:25PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 04:08:57PM -0600,
On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 05:17:29PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> I should not have broken any userspace if CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED is
> enabled with that patch. If that is enabled, and that patch still
> causes problems, please let me know.
But we still need to update the help text for CONFIG_SYS_DEPRE
On Sun, 2007-03-04 at 17:17 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > > This is due to the recent sysfs restructuring I think. IIRC the fix is
> > > to upgrade hal to a current git version.
> >
> > If that's the cause, the fix is to back out whatever was done to break
> > userspace. Breaking userspace is not ok.
On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 11:02:48PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 12:42:29AM -0600, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 05:16:25PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 04:08:57PM -0600, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > > > Recent kernels are having troubles with w
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 12:42:29AM -0600, Matt Mackall wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 05:16:25PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 04:08:57PM -0600, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > > Recent kernels are having troubles with wireless for me. Two seemingly
> > > related problems:
> > >
> >
On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 05:16:25PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 04:08:57PM -0600, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > Recent kernels are having troubles with wireless for me. Two seemingly
> > related problems:
> >
> > a) NetworkManager seems oblivious to the existence of my IPW2200
> > b)
On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 06:25:50PM -0600, Matt Mackall wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 12:39:24AM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > [adding linux-wireless to CC]
> >
> > On Sun, 2007-03-04 at 16:08 -0600, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > > Recent kernels are having troubles with wireless for me. Two seeming
On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 04:08:57PM -0600, Matt Mackall wrote:
> Recent kernels are having troubles with wireless for me. Two seemingly
> related problems:
>
> a) NetworkManager seems oblivious to the existence of my IPW2200
> b) Manual iwconfig waits for 60s and then reports:
>
> Error for wirele
On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 04:45:25PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Mar 2007 18:25:50 -0600 Matt Mackall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 12:39:24AM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > > [adding linux-wireless to CC]
> > >
> > > On Sun, 2007-03-04 at 16:08 -0600, Matt M
On Sun, 4 Mar 2007 18:25:50 -0600 Matt Mackall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 12:39:24AM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > [adding linux-wireless to CC]
> >
> > On Sun, 2007-03-04 at 16:08 -0600, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > > Recent kernels are having troubles with wireless for me
On 3/5/07, Matt Mackall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is due to the recent sysfs restructuring I think. IIRC the fix is
> to upgrade hal to a current git version.
If that's the cause, the fix is to back out whatever was done to break
userspace. Breaking userspace is not ok. Upgrading from 2.
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 12:39:24AM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> [adding linux-wireless to CC]
>
> On Sun, 2007-03-04 at 16:08 -0600, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > Recent kernels are having troubles with wireless for me. Two seemingly
> > related problems:
>
> I don't think they are related actually.
>
[adding linux-wireless to CC]
On Sun, 2007-03-04 at 16:08 -0600, Matt Mackall wrote:
> Recent kernels are having troubles with wireless for me. Two seemingly
> related problems:
I don't think they are related actually.
> a) NetworkManager seems oblivious to the existence of my IPW2200
This is d
28 matches
Mail list logo
