On 07/26/2013 12:37 PM, Roger Quadros wrote:
On 07/26/2013 01:23 PM, Arend van Spriel wrote:
On 07/26/2013 12:15 PM, Arend van Spriel wrote:
On 07/26/2013 12:13 PM, Arend van Spriel wrote:
On 07/26/2013 05:00 AM, Joel Fernandes wrote:
On 07/25/2013 09:49 PM, Joel Fernandes wrote:
[..]
Can
On 07/26/2013 01:23 PM, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> On 07/26/2013 12:15 PM, Arend van Spriel wrote:
>> On 07/26/2013 12:13 PM, Arend van Spriel wrote:
>>> On 07/26/2013 05:00 AM, Joel Fernandes wrote:
On 07/25/2013 09:49 PM, Joel Fernandes wrote:
[..]
>> Can I get back on this
On 07/26/2013 12:15 PM, Arend van Spriel wrote:
On 07/26/2013 12:13 PM, Arend van Spriel wrote:
On 07/26/2013 05:00 AM, Joel Fernandes wrote:
On 07/25/2013 09:49 PM, Joel Fernandes wrote:
[..]
Can I get back on this topic. When USB and ethernet was working for me
as stated above, I was not d
On 07/26/2013 12:13 PM, Arend van Spriel wrote:
On 07/26/2013 05:00 AM, Joel Fernandes wrote:
On 07/25/2013 09:49 PM, Joel Fernandes wrote:
[..]
Can I get back on this topic. When USB and ethernet was working for me
as stated above, I was not doing tftpboot. When I use tftpboot the
images are
On 07/26/2013 05:00 AM, Joel Fernandes wrote:
On 07/25/2013 09:49 PM, Joel Fernandes wrote:
[..]
Can I get back on this topic. When USB and ethernet was working for me
as stated above, I was not doing tftpboot. When I use tftpboot the
images are obtained from the tftp server, but after kernel
On 07/25/2013 09:49 PM, Joel Fernandes wrote:
[..]
>> Can I get back on this topic. When USB and ethernet was working for me
>> as stated above, I was not doing tftpboot. When I use tftpboot the
>> images are obtained from the tftp server, but after kernel has started
>> there is nothing in /sys/
Hi Arend,
On 07/25/2013 08:06 AM, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> On 07/18/2013 02:42 PM, Roger Quadros wrote:
>> On 07/18/2013 03:38 PM, Arend van Spriel wrote:
>>> On 07/18/2013 01:30 PM, Roger Quadros wrote:
On 07/18/2013 02:24 PM, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> On 07/18/2013 01:18 PM, Roger Quad
On 07/18/2013 02:42 PM, Roger Quadros wrote:
On 07/18/2013 03:38 PM, Arend van Spriel wrote:
On 07/18/2013 01:30 PM, Roger Quadros wrote:
On 07/18/2013 02:24 PM, Arend van Spriel wrote:
On 07/18/2013 01:18 PM, Roger Quadros wrote:
Hi Arend,
On 07/18/2013 11:41 AM, Arend van Spriel wrote:
Hi
On Thu, 2013-07-18 at 01:59 -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Arend van Spriel [130718 01:47]:
> Then for the SDIO with device tree, take a look at the following
> patches:
>
> [PATCH 0/3] WLAN support for omap4 when booted with devicetree
> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.omap/9752
On 07/19/2013 12:49 PM, Roger Quadros wrote:
On 07/19/2013 01:36 PM, Arend van Spriel wrote:
On 07/18/2013 10:59 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
Then for the SDIO with device tree, take a look at the following
patches:
[PATCH 0/3] WLAN support for omap4 when booted with devicetree
http://comments.gma
* Arend van Spriel [130719 03:43]:
> On 07/18/2013 10:59 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> >Then for the SDIO with device tree, take a look at the following
> >patches:
> >
> >[PATCH 0/3] WLAN support for omap4 when booted with devicetree
> >http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.omap/97522#
>
On 07/19/2013 01:36 PM, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> On 07/18/2013 10:59 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>> Then for the SDIO with device tree, take a look at the following
>> patches:
>>
>> [PATCH 0/3] WLAN support for omap4 when booted with devicetree
>> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.omap
On 07/18/2013 10:59 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
Then for the SDIO with device tree, take a look at the following
patches:
[PATCH 0/3] WLAN support for omap4 when booted with devicetree
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.omap/97522#
I have been looking at the pandaboard patch in the s
On 07/18/2013 03:38 PM, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> On 07/18/2013 01:30 PM, Roger Quadros wrote:
>> On 07/18/2013 02:24 PM, Arend van Spriel wrote:
>>> On 07/18/2013 01:18 PM, Roger Quadros wrote:
Hi Arend,
On 07/18/2013 11:41 AM, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> Hi Tony,
>
>
On 07/18/2013 01:30 PM, Roger Quadros wrote:
On 07/18/2013 02:24 PM, Arend van Spriel wrote:
On 07/18/2013 01:18 PM, Roger Quadros wrote:
Hi Arend,
On 07/18/2013 11:41 AM, Arend van Spriel wrote:
Hi Tony,
We are using the panda board (es variant) for testing our SDIO based chips. For
this
On 07/18/2013 02:24 PM, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> On 07/18/2013 01:18 PM, Roger Quadros wrote:
>> Hi Arend,
>>
>> On 07/18/2013 11:41 AM, Arend van Spriel wrote:
>>> Hi Tony,
>>>
>>>
>>> We are using the panda board (es variant) for testing our SDIO based chips.
>>> For this we have an adapter car
On 07/18/2013 01:18 PM, Roger Quadros wrote:
Hi Arend,
On 07/18/2013 11:41 AM, Arend van Spriel wrote:
Hi Tony,
We are using the panda board (es variant) for testing our SDIO based chips. For
this we have an adapter card connection to expansion connector A. As this
adapter is not publicly a
Hi Arend,
On 07/18/2013 11:41 AM, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> Hi Tony,
>
>
> We are using the panda board (es variant) for testing our SDIO based chips.
> For this we have an adapter card connection to expansion connector A. As this
> adapter is not publicly available we had internally patched
On 07/18/2013 10:59 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Arend van Spriel [130718 01:47]:
So my first step was to follow the recipe given in that commit.
Beside that I noticed a thread about USB issue on LKML so I also
applied the following commit:
commit 352f573e59050c7a604c35c58b4bbfc51edebbee
Author:
* Arend van Spriel [130718 01:47]:
>
> We are using the panda board (es variant) for testing our SDIO based
> chips. For this we have an adapter card connection to expansion
> connector A. As this adapter is not publicly available we had
> internally patched board-omap4panda.c. Also we follow the
20 matches
Mail list logo
