On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 01:35:44PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> *renamed*, i.e. does the tools (e2fsck &c) use "/lost+found" by name,
> or by inode? As far as I know it always uses the same inode number
e2fsck uses /lost+found by name, not by inode. It will recreate a new
lost+found directory
H. Peter Anvin writes:
> Hello people... the original question was: can lost+found be
> *renamed*, i.e. does the tools (e2fsck &c) use "/lost+found" by name,
> or by inode? As far as I know it always uses the same inode number
> (11), but I don't know if that is anywhere enforced.
Bzzt. /lost+f
On Sun, 28 Jan 2001, Mo McKinlay wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Today, H. Peter Anvin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> > Hello people... the original question was: can lost+found be
> > *renamed*, i.e. does the tools (e2fsck &c) use "/lost+found" by name,
> > o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Today, H. Peter Anvin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hello people... the original question was: can lost+found be
> *renamed*, i.e. does the tools (e2fsck &c) use "/lost+found" by name,
> or by inode? As far as I know it always uses the same ino
Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
By author:Thunder from the hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> > A file-system without a lost+found directory is like love without sex.
> You mean, possible but leaving you unsatisfied? Well, I think a file
> system without a lost+found
On Friday, January 26, 2001 01:19:49 PM -0500 James Lewis Nance
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FWIW IBM's JFS file system does not have a lost+found directory. I dont
> remember if reiserfs does or not.
>
reiserfsck creates it.
-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscri
> A file-system without a lost+found directory is like love without sex.
You mean, possible but leaving you unsatisfied? Well, I think a file
system without a lost+found is a lot worse.
Thunder
---
Woah... I did a "cat /boot/vmlinuz >> /dev/audio" - and I think I heard
god...
-
To unsubscribe f
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> On 01/26/01 01:19 PM James Lewis Nance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> FWIW IBM's JFS file system does not have a lost+found directory. I dont
>> remember if reiserfs does or not.
>
> Actually it does.
>
> From one of my rs/6000's sitting here, with a pretty much defa
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 06:05:54PM -0200, Rodrigo Barbosa (aka morcego) wrote:
>
> I think JFS indeed doesn't have it. And ReiserFS doesn't too. This
> should be common place for journaling filesystems.
No, it's nothing to do with journaling or not. Even journaling
filesystems can suffer
On 01/26/01 01:19 PM James Lewis Nance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>FWIW IBM's JFS file system does not have a lost+found directory. I dont
>remember if reiserfs does or not.
>Jim
Actually it does.
>From one of my rs/6000's sitting here, with a pretty much default AIX
install:
# uname -a
AIX
alias ls="ls -I "lost+found"'
On Fri, 26 Jan 2001, Mike Harrold wrote:
> >
> >
> > An other maybe too obvious way, could be to :
> >
> > alias ls='ls | grep -v "lost+found"'
>
> This turns multiple column output into one single column.
>
> Regards,
>
> /Mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list
On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 01:19:49PM -0500, James Lewis Nance wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 08:49:31AM -0500, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 26 Jan 2001, Rob Kaper wrote:
> > > Is there a way to rename lost+found ?? It bothers me to see it in ls all the
>
> > Get used to it. This is pa
An other maybe too obvious way, could be to :
alias ls='ls | grep -v "lost+found"'
if you are really annoyed by this tiny thing, which is
IMHO, really the least thing i could be annoyed
of...
This took part on Unix file system design, from the
old days, as mentioned earlier by others.
Also th
Rob Kaper writes:
> Is there a way to rename lost+found ?? It bothers me to see it in ls all the
> time because 99.9% of my time it's just useless and I really think
> .lost+found (a hidden file) would make much more sense for daily use. I
> assume this would require some ext2 changes as well as a
On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 08:49:31AM -0500, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Jan 2001, Rob Kaper wrote:
> > Is there a way to rename lost+found ?? It bothers me to see it in ls all the
> Get used to it. This is part of the Linux/Unix heritage! A file-system
> without a lost+found directory
On Fri, 26 Jan 2001, Rob Kaper wrote:
> If this is ext2 specific, just say so and I'll find a better list to discuss
> this: (any good ext2 lists available for example?)
>
> Is there a way to rename lost+found ?? It bothers me to see it in ls all the
> time because 99.9% of my time it's just use
16 matches
Mail list logo
