On 02/14/2013 08:15 AM, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> Mark, how about this one? I compiled it and ran on my fedora 16 with
> SElinux enabled, no obvious issues.
>
> From a19350097200570571aa522afebb96b34db534f4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Artem Bityutskiy
> Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 09:07:36 +0200
Mark, how about this one? I compiled it and ran on my fedora 16 with
SElinux enabled, no obvious issues.
>From a19350097200570571aa522afebb96b34db534f4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Artem Bityutskiy
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 09:07:36 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] selinux: do not confuse lockdep
Selinux h
On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 15:37 +0100, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> > + lockdep_set_class(&isec->lock, inode->i_sb->s_type->i_mutex_key);
>
> So I added an "&", so that the line looks like that:
Yeah, I did not compile it, and for the deadlock of course I have to add
own class for isec->lock in the f
On 02/13/2013 01:47 PM, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
>> I'm on a arm imx28 v3.8-rc6 (+ a handfull of patches to support the
>> custom board) but no modifications on ubifs, selinux or the vfs layer.
>> And not including the xattr patches by Subodh Nijsure.
>>
>> When booting with SELinux and lockdep enab
On Fri, 2013-02-08 at 15:10 +0100, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm on a arm imx28 v3.8-rc6 (+ a handfull of patches to support the
> custom board) but no modifications on ubifs, selinux or the vfs layer.
> And not including the xattr patches by Subodh Nijsure.
>
> When booting with SELi
5 matches
Mail list logo
