On Wed 04-01-17 09:40:25, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
[...]
> Ok, 4.10.0-0.rc2.git0.1.fc26.x86_64 is not stable (4.9.0-1.fc26.x86_64 was).
Does the same happen with the vanilla kernels?
> The VM stops working (e.g. not pingable) after around 8h (will be restarted
> automatically), happened serveral
On 23.12.2016 03:55, Minchan Kim wrote:
On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 04:52:07PM +0100, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
On 09.12.2016 14:40, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Fri 09-12-16 08:06:25, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
Hello,
same with latest kernel rc, dnf still killed with OOM (but sometimes
better).
./update
On 23.12.2016 03:55, Minchan Kim wrote:
On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 04:52:07PM +0100, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
On 09.12.2016 14:40, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Fri 09-12-16 08:06:25, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
Hello,
same with latest kernel rc, dnf still killed with OOM (but sometimes
better).
./update
On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 04:52:07PM +0100, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
> On 09.12.2016 14:40, Michal Hocko wrote:
> >On Fri 09-12-16 08:06:25, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
> >>Hello,
> >>
> >>same with latest kernel rc, dnf still killed with OOM (but sometimes
> >>better).
> >>
> >>./update.sh: line 40: 1
On Sat 10-12-16 14:50:34, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
[...]
> IMHO: The OOM killer should NOT kick in even on the highest workloads if
> there is swap available.
This is not so simple. Take a heavy swap trashing situation as an
example. You still have a lot of swap space and an anonymous memory
which
On 09.12.2016 22:42, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
On 12/09/2016 07:01 PM, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
On 09.12.2016 18:30, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Fri 09-12-16 17:58:14, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
On 09.12.2016 17:09, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
[97883.882611] Mem-Info:
[97883.883747] active_anon:2915 ina
On 12/09/2016 07:01 PM, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
> On 09.12.2016 18:30, Michal Hocko wrote:
>> On Fri 09-12-16 17:58:14, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
>>> On 09.12.2016 17:09, Michal Hocko wrote:
>> [...]
> [97883.882611] Mem-Info:
> [97883.883747] active_anon:2915 inactive_anon:3376 isolated_an
On 09.12.2016 18:30, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Fri 09-12-16 17:58:14, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
On 09.12.2016 17:09, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
[97883.882611] Mem-Info:
[97883.883747] active_anon:2915 inactive_anon:3376 isolated_anon:0
active_file:3902 inactive_file:3639 isolated_
On Fri 09-12-16 17:58:14, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
> On 09.12.2016 17:09, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
> > > [97883.882611] Mem-Info:
> > > [97883.883747] active_anon:2915 inactive_anon:3376 isolated_anon:0
> > > active_file:3902 inactive_file:3639 isolated_file:0
> > >
On 09.12.2016 17:09, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Fri 09-12-16 16:52:07, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
On 09.12.2016 14:40, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Fri 09-12-16 08:06:25, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
Hello,
same with latest kernel rc, dnf still killed with OOM (but sometimes
better).
./update.sh: line 40:
On Fri 09-12-16 16:52:07, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
> On 09.12.2016 14:40, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Fri 09-12-16 08:06:25, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > same with latest kernel rc, dnf still killed with OOM (but sometimes
> > > better).
> > >
> > > ./update.sh: line 40: 1591
On 09.12.2016 14:40, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Fri 09-12-16 08:06:25, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
Hello,
same with latest kernel rc, dnf still killed with OOM (but sometimes
better).
./update.sh: line 40: 1591 Killed ${EXE} update ${PARAMS}
(does dnf clean all;dnf update)
Linux dat
On 09.12.2016 16:52, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
On 09.12.2016 14:40, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Fri 09-12-16 08:06:25, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
Hello,
same with latest kernel rc, dnf still killed with OOM (but sometimes
better).
./update.sh: line 40: 1591 Killed ${EXE} update
${P
On 09.12.2016 14:40, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Fri 09-12-16 08:06:25, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
Hello,
same with latest kernel rc, dnf still killed with OOM (but sometimes
better).
./update.sh: line 40: 1591 Killed ${EXE} update ${PARAMS}
(does dnf clean all;dnf update)
Linux dat
On Fri 09-12-16 08:06:25, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
> Hello,
>
> same with latest kernel rc, dnf still killed with OOM (but sometimes
> better).
>
> ./update.sh: line 40: 1591 Killed ${EXE} update ${PARAMS}
> (does dnf clean all;dnf update)
> Linux database.intern 4.9.0-0.rc8.git
Hello,
same with latest kernel rc, dnf still killed with OOM (but sometimes
better).
./update.sh: line 40: 1591 Killed ${EXE} update ${PARAMS}
(does dnf clean all;dnf update)
Linux database.intern 4.9.0-0.rc8.git2.1.fc26.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Dec 7
17:53:29 UTC 2016 x86_64 x86_6
Hello,
See also:
Bug 1314697 - Kernel 4.4.3-300.fc23.x86_64 is not stable inside a KVM VM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1314697
Ciao,
Gerhard
On 30.11.2016 08:10, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
Hello,
I'm having out of memory situations with my "low memory" VMs in KVM
under Fedora (
17 matches
Mail list logo
