On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 11:22:28AM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 03:16:39AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 09:48:53PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > All I can say is that there doesn't look to be any obvious signs
> > > that this is a XFS or wr
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 03:16:39AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 09:48:53PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > All I can say is that there doesn't look to be any obvious signs
> > that this is a XFS or writeback problem fom the stack trace, and
> > without more informati
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 09:48:53PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> All I can say is that there doesn't look to be any obvious signs
> that this is a XFS or writeback problem fom the stack trace, and
> without more information or a reproducable test case I'm not going
> to be able to understand the cau
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 02:14:07AM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> I can hit this pretty reliably on one of my slower test machines.
> (8gb ram, 1 slow sata disk)
>
> the machine is pretty responsive, and recovers after a while.
> anything we can do to shut it up ?
Actually, I think this indicates a p
4 matches
Mail list logo
