(to alan)
Alan Cox wrote:
> > I am interested in this too because a) I am the bad guy that did the 2.4 port
> > and therefor may be the one to blame for it and b) if a) is true I'll have to go
> > and fix it.
>
> No its something I've not yet fixed...
>
> cs_ac97_set needs to check nore than
(to alan)
test10-pre1.
-d
Alan Cox wrote:
> > kernel, I can still load the cs46xx module..which will work. When
> > compiled in, it shows zero indication of actually being in there, no
> > boot messages etc.
>
> 2.2 or 2.4 - that sounds like its not being run from the sound init.
>
> > 2) i
(to alan)
test10-pre1.
-d
Alan Cox wrote:
kernel, I can still load the cs46xx module..which will work. When
compiled in, it shows zero indication of actually being in there, no
boot messages etc.
2.2 or 2.4 - that sounds like its not being run from the sound init.
2) i have to
(to alan)
Alan Cox wrote:
I am interested in this too because a) I am the bad guy that did the 2.4 port
and therefor may be the one to blame for it and b) if a) is true I'll have to go
and fix it.
No its something I've not yet fixed...
cs_ac97_set needs to check nore than CD_VOL.
4 matches
Mail list logo