AJ Lewis writes:
>
> --CblX+4bnyfN0pR09
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Disposition: inline
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 01:32:03PM +0100, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> > > What it should do is change based on whether devfs is
On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 01:32:03PM +0100, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> > What it should do is change based on whether devfs is mounted
> > or not. It doesn't make *any* sense to have
> > /dev/ide/host0/foo/bar in your /proc/partitions entries if you
> > aren't mounting devfs.
> " " == AJ Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 04:10:23PM +0100, Guest section DW
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 08:52:54PM +1100, Glenn McGrath wrote:
>>
>> > Im running kernel 2.4.1, I have entries like /proc/ide/hda, >
>>
== AJ Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 04:10:23PM +0100, Guest section DW
wrote:
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 08:52:54PM +1100, Glenn McGrath wrote:
Im running kernel 2.4.1, I have entries like /proc/ide/hda,
/proc/ide/ide0/hda etc
On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 01:32:03PM +0100, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
What it should do is change based on whether devfs is mounted
or not. It doesn't make *any* sense to have
/dev/ide/host0/foo/bar in your /proc/partitions entries if you
aren't mounting devfs. The
AJ Lewis writes:
--CblX+4bnyfN0pR09
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 01:32:03PM +0100, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
What it should do is change based on whether devfs is mounted
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 04:10:23PM +0100, Guest section DW wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 08:52:54PM +1100, Glenn McGrath wrote:
>
> > Im running kernel 2.4.1, I have entries like /proc/ide/hda,
> > /proc/ide/ide0/hda etc irrespective of wether im using devfs or
> > traditional device names.
>
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 04:10:23PM +0100, Guest section DW wrote:
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 08:52:54PM +1100, Glenn McGrath wrote:
Im running kernel 2.4.1, I have entries like /proc/ide/hda,
/proc/ide/ide0/hda etc irrespective of wether im using devfs or
traditional device names.
Is
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 09:29:24PM +1100, Glenn McGrath wrote:
> Well leaving it the way it is doesnt make much sense either really, it
> refers to devices that dont exist.
You are mistaken. The existence of a device is unrekated to the name
someone uses to access it. You may well use
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 08:52:54PM +1100, Glenn McGrath wrote:
> Im running kernel 2.4.1, I have entries like /proc/ide/hda,
> /proc/ide/ide0/hda etc irrespective of wether im using devfs or
> traditional device names.
>
> Is always using traditional device names for /proc/ide intentional, or
>
Glenn McGrath wrote:
> Helge Hafting wrote:
>
>> Glenn McGrath wrote:
>>
>>> Im running kernel 2.4.1, I have entries like /proc/ide/hda,
>>> /proc/ide/ide0/hda etc irrespective of wether im using devfs or
>>> traditional device names.
>>>
>>> Is always using traditional device names for
Helge Hafting wrote:
>
> Glenn McGrath wrote:
> >
> > Im running kernel 2.4.1, I have entries like /proc/ide/hda,
> > /proc/ide/ide0/hda etc irrespective of wether im using devfs or
> > traditional device names.
> >
> > Is always using traditional device names for /proc/ide intentional, or
> >
Glenn McGrath wrote:
>
> Im running kernel 2.4.1, I have entries like /proc/ide/hda,
> /proc/ide/ide0/hda etc irrespective of wether im using devfs or
> traditional device names.
>
> Is always using traditional device names for /proc/ide intentional, or
> is it something nobody has gotten
Glenn McGrath wrote:
Im running kernel 2.4.1, I have entries like /proc/ide/hda,
/proc/ide/ide0/hda etc irrespective of wether im using devfs or
traditional device names.
Is always using traditional device names for /proc/ide intentional, or
is it something nobody has gotten around to
Helge Hafting wrote:
Glenn McGrath wrote:
Im running kernel 2.4.1, I have entries like /proc/ide/hda,
/proc/ide/ide0/hda etc irrespective of wether im using devfs or
traditional device names.
Is always using traditional device names for /proc/ide intentional, or
is it something
Glenn McGrath wrote:
Helge Hafting wrote:
Glenn McGrath wrote:
Im running kernel 2.4.1, I have entries like /proc/ide/hda,
/proc/ide/ide0/hda etc irrespective of wether im using devfs or
traditional device names.
Is always using traditional device names for /proc/ide intentional, or
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 08:52:54PM +1100, Glenn McGrath wrote:
Im running kernel 2.4.1, I have entries like /proc/ide/hda,
/proc/ide/ide0/hda etc irrespective of wether im using devfs or
traditional device names.
Is always using traditional device names for /proc/ide intentional, or
is it
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 09:29:24PM +1100, Glenn McGrath wrote:
Well leaving it the way it is doesnt make much sense either really, it
refers to devices that dont exist.
You are mistaken. The existence of a device is unrekated to the name
someone uses to access it. You may well use
18 matches
Mail list logo
