Re: duplicated include files

2007-11-14 Thread Sam Ravnborg
> > Are you building in a different tree than the source tree? The patch below > fixed it for me. > > Question: Why don't GENKSYMS and KALLSYMS need the $(srctree) prefix? They are generated binaries that live in the output directory structure. > --- > Subject: kbuild: Add missing srctree prefi

Re: duplicated include files

2007-11-05 Thread Marco Costalba
On 11/5/07, Geert Uytterhoeven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Are you building in a different tree than the source tree? The patch below > fixed it for me. > Yes, I am. Thanks for the patch. Marco - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message t

Re: duplicated include files

2007-11-05 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Sun, 4 Nov 2007, Marco Costalba wrote: > make includecheck does not work for me. Linux tree is from latest git. > > bash-3.2$ pwd > /git/linux-2.6 > > bash-3.2$ make includecheck > find * \( -name SCCS -o -name BitKeeper -o -name .svn -o -name CVS -o > -name .pc -o -name .hg -o -name .git \) -

Re: duplicated include files

2007-11-05 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Sun, 4 Nov 2007, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > given the recent patches to remove duplicated #include preprocessor > directives in source files, let it be known that there are a number of > them: > > http://www.crashcourse.ca/wiki/index.php/Duplicate_include_files > > help yourself. Thanks!

Re: duplicated include files

2007-11-04 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Sun, 4 Nov 2007, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > actually, one wonders if there's any value in keeping any references > > to other version control systems such as subversion, SCCS, CVS, > > mercurial, etc. > > What do you mean by "other"? git doesn't have a monopoly, a

Re: duplicated include files

2007-11-04 Thread Paul Mundt
On Sun, Nov 04, 2007 at 08:03:48PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > BTW: "make includecheck" already does the same... > When was that added? It's not listed in the 'make help', and I see there's a versioncheck too that's not reported. Some of these are actually useful, I wonder what else is lurking in

Re: duplicated include files

2007-11-04 Thread Bernd Petrovitsch
On Sun, 2007-11-04 at 14:49 -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote: [...] > actually, one wonders if there's any value in keeping any references > to other version control systems such as subversion, SCCS, CVS, > mercurial, etc. Lots of people have their working trees in CVS, Subversion, So it probabl

Re: duplicated include files

2007-11-04 Thread Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Robert P. J. Day wrote: > actually, one wonders if there's any value in keeping any references > to other version control systems such as subversion, SCCS, CVS, > mercurial, etc. > What do you mean by "other"? git doesn't have a monopoly, and the kernel should support people using a reasonable

Re: duplicated include files

2007-11-04 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Sun, 4 Nov 2007, Marco Costalba wrote: > On 11/4/07, Marco Costalba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > make includecheck does not work for me. Linux tree is from latest git. > > > > bash-3.2$ pwd > > /git/linux-2.6 > > > > bash-3.2$ make includecheck > > find * \( -name SCCS -o -name BitKeeper -o -

Re: duplicated include files

2007-11-04 Thread Randy Dunlap
On Sun, 4 Nov 2007 20:43:01 +0100 Marco Costalba wrote: > On 11/4/07, Marco Costalba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > make includecheck does not work for me. Linux tree is from latest git. > > > > bash-3.2$ pwd > > /git/linux-2.6 > > > > bash-3.2$ make includecheck > > find * \( -name SCCS -o -name

Re: duplicated include files

2007-11-04 Thread Marco Costalba
On 11/4/07, Marco Costalba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > make includecheck does not work for me. Linux tree is from latest git. > > bash-3.2$ pwd > /git/linux-2.6 > > bash-3.2$ make includecheck > find * \( -name SCCS -o -name BitKeeper -o -name .svn -o -name CVS -o BTW what's that 'BitKeeper' foss

Re: duplicated include files

2007-11-04 Thread Marco Costalba
make includecheck does not work for me. Linux tree is from latest git. bash-3.2$ pwd /git/linux-2.6 bash-3.2$ make includecheck find * \( -name SCCS -o -name BitKeeper -o -name .svn -o -name CVS -o -name .pc -o -name .hg -o -name .git \) -prune -o \ -name '*.[hcS]' -type f -print

Re: duplicated include files

2007-11-04 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Sun, 4 Nov 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote: > BTW: "make includecheck" already does the same... oh ... well, then, let's just ignore the last few postings, shall we? :-P rday -- Robert P. J. Day Linux Consulting, Training and

Re: duplicated include files

2007-11-04 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, Nov 04, 2007 at 01:37:31PM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > On Sun, 4 Nov 2007, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > On Sun, 4 Nov 2007 12:31:38 -0500 (EST) Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > > > > > > given the recent patches to remove duplicated #include preprocessor > > > directives in source files,

Re: duplicated include files

2007-11-04 Thread Randy Dunlap
On Sun, 4 Nov 2007 13:37:31 -0500 (EST) Robert P. J. Day wrote: > On Sun, 4 Nov 2007, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > On Sun, 4 Nov 2007 12:31:38 -0500 (EST) Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > > > > > > given the recent patches to remove duplicated #include preprocessor > > > directives in source files, l

Re: duplicated include files

2007-11-04 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Sun, 4 Nov 2007, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On Sun, 4 Nov 2007 12:31:38 -0500 (EST) Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > > > given the recent patches to remove duplicated #include preprocessor > > directives in source files, let it be known that there are a number of > > them: > > > > http://www.crashc

Re: duplicated include files

2007-11-04 Thread Randy Dunlap
On Sun, 4 Nov 2007 12:31:38 -0500 (EST) Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > given the recent patches to remove duplicated #include preprocessor > directives in source files, let it be known that there are a number of > them: > > http://www.crashcourse.ca/wiki/index.php/Duplicate_include_files > > h