On Fri, 15 Feb 2013, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On 02/15/2013 05:21 PM, Seiji Aguchi wrote:
> > Rik, Satoru,
> >
> > Do you have any comments?
>
> IIRC at the time the patch was rejected as too inelegant.
>
> However, nobody else seems to have come up with a better plan, and
> there are users in need
On 02/15/2013 05:21 PM, Seiji Aguchi wrote:
> Rik, Satoru,
>
> Do you have any comments?
>
> Seiji
Hmm, this seems what we wanted to know in the previous thread.
Because extra_free_kbytes is quite simple and it fixes the problem,
it should be merged into upstream.
Regards,
Satoru
>> -Ori
On 02/15/2013 05:21 PM, Seiji Aguchi wrote:
Rik, Satoru,
Do you have any comments?
IIRC at the time the patch was rejected as too inelegant.
However, nobody else seems to have come up with a better plan, and
there are users in need of a fix for this problem.
I would still like to see a fix f
Rik, Satoru,
Do you have any comments?
Seiji
> -Original Message-
> From: linux-kernel-ow...@vger.kernel.org
> [mailto:linux-kernel-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of dormando
> Sent: Monday, February 11, 2013 9:01 PM
> To: Rik van Riel
> Cc: Randy Dunlap; Satoru Moriya; linux-kernel@v
4 matches
Mail list logo