Re: get_user_ret

2000-11-30 Thread Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Em Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 05:58:19PM +0100, Øyvind Jægtnes escreveu: > > This get_user_ret thing seems to have changed again... what is the > correct syntax now? if (get_user(blah, bleh)) return -EFAULT; *_user*_ret is gone for good. - Arnaldo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the li

Re: get_user_ret

2000-09-15 Thread Mohammad A. Haque
There's several of similar ones that have been renamed... copy_to_user_ret put_user_ret get_user_ret replace with if(get_user(..)) return -EFAULT; Along these lines, I've made a patch to lm_sensors so that they work under test8. Patch is available at http://www.haque.net/softwar

Re: get_user_ret

2000-09-15 Thread David S. Miller
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Øyvind Jægtnes) Date:15 Sep 2000 11:42:38 +0200 I have a couple of sound modules which fails under 2.4.0-test8 because they can't resolve get_user_ret(). Anyone know what to use instead? Replace it with: if (get_user(...))