Re: gitorious v3.12-rc1-n900 tree

2013-11-11 Thread Pali Rohár
On Wednesday 06 November 2013 23:42:41 Pavel Machek wrote: > On Wed 2013-11-06 00:12:41, Pavel Machek wrote: > > Hi! > > > > > > I tried pulling current linux-n900 tree from gitorious. > > > > > > Hi, use branch v3.12-rc5-n900 (not -rc1) and consider > > > using rx51_defconfig. > > > > rx51_defc

Re: gitorious v3.12-rc1-n900 tree

2013-11-06 Thread Pavel Machek
On Wed 2013-11-06 00:12:41, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > > I tried pulling current linux-n900 tree from gitorious. > > > > Hi, use branch v3.12-rc5-n900 (not -rc1) and consider using > > rx51_defconfig. > > rx51_defconfig works for me, thanks. > > And here are fixes for the problems I hit..

Re: gitorious v3.12-rc1-n900 tree

2013-11-05 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > I tried pulling current linux-n900 tree from gitorious. > > Hi, use branch v3.12-rc5-n900 (not -rc1) and consider using > rx51_defconfig. rx51_defconfig works for me, thanks. And here are fixes for the problems I hit... please apply, Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek diff --git a/drivers/

Re: gitorious v3.12-rc1-n900 tree

2013-11-05 Thread Pali Rohár
On Tuesday 05 November 2013 13:00:16 Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > I tried pulling current linux-n900 tree from gitorious. Hi, use branch v3.12-rc5-n900 (not -rc1) and consider using rx51_defconfig. -- Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed mess