Re: io scheduler silly question perhaps..

On 7/29/05, Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 28 2005, Nate Diller wrote: > > Try benchmarking Anticipatory or Deadline against Noop, preferably > > with your actual workload. Noop is probably what you want, since > > there is not much use in avoiding large "seeks". It could be

Re: io scheduler silly question perhaps..

On Thu, Jul 28 2005, Nate Diller wrote: > Try benchmarking Anticipatory or Deadline against Noop, preferably > with your actual workload. Noop is probably what you want, since > there is not much use in avoiding large "seeks". It could be though > that request merging, which the non-noop schedule

Re: io scheduler silly question perhaps..

Try benchmarking Anticipatory or Deadline against Noop, preferably with your actual workload. Noop is probably what you want, since there is not much use in avoiding large "seeks". It could be though that request merging, which the non-noop schedulers all perform, willl cause Noop to lose. I hav