On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 04:53:54PM -0500, Jessica Yu wrote:
> +++ Luis R. Rodriguez [06/01/17 21:36 +0100]:
> > On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 10:34:53AM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > > "Luis R. Rodriguez" writes:
> > > > Right, out of ~350 request_module() calls (not included try requests)
> > > > onl
+++ Luis R. Rodriguez [06/01/17 21:36 +0100]:
On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 10:34:53AM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
"Luis R. Rodriguez" writes:
> Right, out of ~350 request_module() calls (not included try requests)
> only ~46 check the return value. Hence a validation check, and come to
> think of it
+++ Rusty Russell [03/01/17 10:34 +1030]:
"Luis R. Rodriguez" writes:
Maybe a similar hack for try_then_request_module(), but many places seem
to open-code request_module() so it's not as trivial...
Hi Luis, Jessica (who is the main module maintainer now),
Back from break, sorry about
+++ Luis R. Rodriguez [08/12/16 11:49 -0800]:
kmod has an optimization in place whereby if a some kernel code
uses request_module() on a module already loaded we never bother
userspace as the module already is loaded. This is not true for
get_fs_type() though as it uses aliases.
Additionally kmo
4 matches
Mail list logo
