Re: lguest re-review

2007-05-09 Thread Rusty Russell
On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 17:50 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 10 May 2007 10:24:08 +1000 > Rusty Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 02:51 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > Some concern was expressed over the lguest review status, so I shall send > > > the patches ou

Re: lguest re-review

2007-05-09 Thread Eric W. Biederman
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I don't get it. Does lguest no longer need this code, or will > it be reintroduced with an lguest merge, or something else? No longer needed. For the short term lguest has a separate entry point. For the long term 2.6.23 we will rev the boot protocol

Re: lguest re-review

2007-05-09 Thread Andrew Morton
On Thu, 10 May 2007 10:24:08 +1000 Rusty Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 02:51 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Some concern was expressed over the lguest review status, so I shall send > > the patches out again for people to review, to test, to make observations > > abou

Re: lguest re-review

2007-05-09 Thread Rusty Russell
On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 02:51 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > Some concern was expressed over the lguest review status, so I shall send > the patches out again for people to review, to test, to make observations > about the author's personal appearance, etc. Thanks Andrew, This means I can fi