Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the printk tree

2020-09-09 Thread Petr Mladek
On Tue 2020-09-08 18:59:24, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > On (20/09/08 09:46), Petr Mladek wrote: > > On Sat 2020-09-05 12:18:27, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Commit > > > > > > 4c31ead75f41 ("printk: ringbuffer: support dataless records") > > > > > > is missing a Signed-off

Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the printk tree

2020-09-08 Thread Sergey Senozhatsky
On (20/09/08 09:46), Petr Mladek wrote: > On Sat 2020-09-05 12:18:27, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Commit > > > > 4c31ead75f41 ("printk: ringbuffer: support dataless records") > > > > is missing a Signed-off-by from its committer. > > Thanks for catching this. It should be fixe

Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the printk tree

2020-09-08 Thread Petr Mladek
On Sat 2020-09-05 12:18:27, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Commit > > 4c31ead75f41 ("printk: ringbuffer: support dataless records") > > is missing a Signed-off-by from its committer. Thanks for catching this. It should be fixed now. It has been originally committed by Sergey. I rebase

Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the printk tree

2020-05-21 Thread Petr Mladek
On Thu 2020-05-21 08:04:56, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Commit > > bdb7f0530926 ("printk: Fix a typo in comment "interator"->"iterator"") > > is missing a Signed-off-by from its committer. Thanks for catching this. It should be fixed now. Best Regards, Petr

Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the printk tree

2018-12-18 Thread Petr Mladek
On Tue 2018-12-18 07:08:07, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Petr, > > Commit > > 503283fa006d ("printk: Add caller information to printk() output.") > > is missing a Signed-off-by from its committer. > > Moreover, that patch appears twice in the tree (the other time properly > signed-off), Than