Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 12

2014-12-12 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Andrew, On Fri, 12 Dec 2014 14:56:23 -0800 Andrew Morton wrote: > > How'd that happen? > http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/init-remove-config_init_fallback.patch > removes all mention of CONFIG_INIT_FALLBACK? Well, the patch now in Linus's tree adds the INIT_FALLBACK bit to the Kconf

Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 12

2014-12-12 Thread Andrew Morton
On Fri, 12 Dec 2014 23:36:37 +0100 Paul Bolle wrote: > On Fri, 2014-12-12 at 13:57 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Fri, 12 Dec 2014 11:31:56 +0100 Paul Bolle wrote: > > > > I won't be bothering (Andrew and) you again about this. Unless sorting > > > this out takes rather long, that is. > >

Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 12

2014-12-12 Thread Paul Bolle
On Fri, 2014-12-12 at 13:57 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 12 Dec 2014 11:31:56 +0100 Paul Bolle wrote: > > I won't be bothering (Andrew and) you again about this. Unless sorting > > this out takes rather long, that is. > > Is there some problem with the current mainline 3.19 code? The p

Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 12

2014-12-12 Thread Andrew Morton
On Fri, 12 Dec 2014 11:31:56 +0100 Paul Bolle wrote: > On Fri, 2014-12-12 at 21:04 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > That patch has been in linux-next since Dec 3 as commit 77a4494388ab in > > Andrew's patch set (and maybe earlier). > > Not earlier. Commit 77a4494388ab debuted in next-20141203:

Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 12 (net/bridge)

2014-12-12 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 12/11/14 23:35, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Please do not add any code destined for v3.20 to your linux-next included > trees/branches until after v3.19-rc1 is released. > > Changes since 20141211: I have been seeing this for several days now. Has it already been reported and just n

Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 12 (sound/soc/codecs/rt5640)

2014-12-12 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 12/11/14 23:35, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Please do not add any code destined for v3.20 to your linux-next included > trees/branches until after v3.19-rc1 is released. > > Changes since 20141211: on i386: When CONFIG_ACPI is not enabled & CONFIG_I2C is not enabled: warning: (SND

Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 12

2014-12-12 Thread Paul Bolle
On Fri, 2014-12-12 at 21:04 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > That patch has been in linux-next since Dec 3 as commit 77a4494388ab in > Andrew's patch set (and maybe earlier). Not earlier. Commit 77a4494388ab debuted in next-20141203: $ git tag --contains 77a4494388ab next-20141203

Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 12

2014-12-12 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Paul, On Fri, 12 Dec 2014 10:49:17 +0100 Paul Bolle wrote: > > > $ git checkout master > > $ git reset --hard stable > > [...] > > Merging akpm-current/current (35ac317b788c shmdt: use i_size_read() instead > > of ->i_size) > > CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in tools/testing/selftests/Mak

Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 12

2014-12-12 Thread Paul Bolle
Hi Stephen, On Fri, 2014-12-12 at 18:35 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > -- > Cheers, > Stephen Rothwells...@canb.auug.org.au (Side note: it took me some time to realize that evolution automagically removes the above lines and the log that follows because it is considered one