Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2020-12-03 Thread Andrey Konovalov
On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 9:52 AM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > After merging the akpm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > mm/kasan/quarantine.c: In function 'quarantine_put': > mm/kasan/quarantine.c:197:15: error: 'info' undeclared (first use in thi

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2020-11-15 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Mike, On Sun, 15 Nov 2020 11:01:05 +0200 Mike Rapoport wrote: > > My preference would be to put the entire function body in '#ifdef > CONFIG_MEMCG' here. OK, so today I used this: From: Stephen Rothwell Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 16:55:10 +1100 Subject: [PATCH] secretmem-add-memcg-accounting-fi

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2020-11-15 Thread Mike Rapoport
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 05:14:52PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 18:02:39 +1100 Stephen Rothwell > wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > After merging the akpm tree, today's linux-next build (i386 defconfig) > > failed like this: > > > > mm/secretmem.c: In function 'secretmem_memcg_

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2020-11-13 Thread Andrew Morton
On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 18:02:39 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > After merging the akpm tree, today's linux-next build (i386 defconfig) > failed like this: > > mm/secretmem.c: In function 'secretmem_memcg_charge': > mm/secretmem.c:72:4: error: 'struct page' has no member named 'memcg_d

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2020-09-28 Thread Christoph Hellwig
Thanks, the fix looks correct.

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2020-06-04 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, On Thu, 4 Jun 2020 16:44:42 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > After merging the akpm tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc > allyesconfig) failed like this: > > arch/powerpc/mm/ptdump/ptdump.c: In function 'walk_pagetables': > arch/powerpc/mm/ptdump/ptdump.c:337:25: error

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2020-06-02 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 19:57:41 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Subject: [PATCH] turns out that probe_user_write is used in modular code > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell > --- > mm/maccess.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/mm/maccess.c b/mm/maccess.c > index ddfda8e6f

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2020-05-28 Thread Christoph Hellwig
This looks correct, thanks.

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2020-05-25 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi John, On Mon, 25 May 2020 11:18:46 -0700 John Hubbard wrote: > > Yes, looks good. And in fact, Andrew has the same fix-up in the mmotm branch > of > linux-next.git, as > > commit a76c281a8ddd > ("mmap-locking-api-rename-mmap_sem-to-mmap_lock-fix"). For some reason that was not include

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2020-05-25 Thread John Hubbard
On 2020-05-25 05:17, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, After merging the akpm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this: In file included from include/linux/kernel.h:14, from mm/gup.c:2: mm/gup.c: In function 'internal_get_user_pages_fast': mm/gup.c:2

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2019-02-26 Thread Mike Rapoport
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 06:39:15PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > After merging the akpm tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc > allnoconfig) failed like this: > > /home/sfr/next/next/arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_32.c:176:21: error: > redefinition of 'alloc_stack' > static void

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2018-12-12 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Anshuman, On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 22:35:38 +0530 Anshuman Khandual wrote: > > On 12/03/2018 12:30 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi Andrew, > > > > After merging the akpm tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc_le perf) > > failed like this: > > > > bench/numa.c:37:10: fatal error: linux/numa.

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2018-12-12 Thread Anshuman Khandual
On 12/03/2018 12:30 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > After merging the akpm tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc_le perf) > failed like this: > > bench/numa.c:37:10: fatal error: linux/numa.h: No such file or directory > #include > ^~ > > Caused by patch

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2018-12-03 Thread Anshuman Khandual
On 12/03/2018 12:30 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > After merging the akpm tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc_le perf) > failed like this: > > bench/numa.c:37:10: fatal error: linux/numa.h: No such file or directory > #include > ^~ > > Caused by patch

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2018-11-30 Thread Anshuman Khandual
On 11/30/2018 11:00 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > After merging the akpm tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc_le perf) > failed like this: > > bench/numa.c: In function 'bind_to_node': > bench/numa.c:301:21: error: 'NUMA_NO_NODE' undeclared (first use in this > function); di

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2018-10-16 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > On Mon, 8 Oct 2018 19:03:41 +1100 Stephen Rothwell > wrote: > > > > After merging the akpm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > > > arch/x86/mm/kaslr.c:26:10: fatal error: linux/bootmem.h: No such file or > >

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2018-10-15 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, On Mon, 8 Oct 2018 19:03:41 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > After merging the akpm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > arch/x86/mm/kaslr.c:26:10: fatal error: linux/bootmem.h: No such file or > directory > #include > ^~

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2018-03-21 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Greg, On Wed, 21 Mar 2018 11:02:08 +0100 Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > Patch is now queued up, thanks. Excellent. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell pgpMuNJUwYuTO.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2018-03-21 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 07:17:27PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > After merging the akpm tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc > allyesconfig) failed like this: > > drivers/base/firmware_loader/fallback.c: In function 'map_fw_priv_pages': > drivers/base/firmware_loader/fallback

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2017-08-01 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 8:40 PM, Kees Cook wrote: >> >> I don't know why this has turned up now. I have just left it broken >> for now and would appreciate any fix. > > Thanks for the heads-up! I'm not sure why this suddenly appeared > either, but Arnd has sent a patch for this now. The main diff

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2017-08-01 Thread Kees Cook
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 11:25 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > After merging the akpm tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc > allyesconfig) failed like this: > > In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/paca.h:19:0, > from arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h:42,

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2017-07-03 Thread David Miller
From: Stephen Rothwell Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 16:32:41 +1000 > From: Stephen Rothwell > Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 16:24:35 +1000 > Subject: [PATCH] net/mlx5: fix memcpy limit? > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell Applied, thanks.

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2017-07-03 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, On Fri, 30 Jun 2017 16:32:41 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > After merging the akpm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > In file included from include/linux/bitmap.h:8:0, > from include/linux/cpumask.h:11, > fro

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2017-06-26 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Michal, On Mon, 26 Jun 2017 09:13:46 +0200 Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Mon 26-06-17 16:53:43, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > After merging the akpm tree, today's linux-next build (sparc64 defconfig) > > failed like this: > > > > arch/sparc/kernel/mdesc.c: In function 'mdesc_kmalloc': > > arc

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2017-06-26 Thread Michal Hocko
On Mon 26-06-17 16:53:43, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > After merging the akpm tree, today's linux-next build (sparc64 defconfig) > failed like this: > > arch/sparc/kernel/mdesc.c: In function 'mdesc_kmalloc': > arch/sparc/kernel/mdesc.c:208:48: error: '__GFP_REPEAT' undeclared (first

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2017-03-20 Thread Michal Hocko
On Mon 20-03-17 16:37:35, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > After merging the akpm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > fs/f2fs/node.c: In function 'init_free_nid_cache': > fs/f2fs/node.c:2634:25: error: implicit declaration of function > 'f2fs_kvza

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2017-03-20 Thread Jaegeuk Kim
On 03/20, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Mon 20-03-17 16:37:35, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi Andrew, > > > > After merging the akpm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > > > fs/f2fs/node.c: In function 'init_free_nid_cache': > > fs/f2fs/node.c:2634:25: error:

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2017-03-06 Thread Laura Abbott
On 03/06/2017 07:07 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > After merging the akpm tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc > ppc64_defconfig) failed like this: > > In file included from include/net/sock.h:64:0, > from include/linux/tcp.h:23, > from include/l

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2016-01-26 Thread Takashi Iwai
On Tue, 26 Jan 2016 21:51:30 +0100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi Takashi, > > On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 14:45:55 +0100 Takashi Iwai wrote: > > > > From: Takashi Iwai > > Subject: [PATCH v2] ALSA: compress: Disable GET_CODEC_CAPS ioctl for some > > architectures > > > > Some architectures like Pow

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2016-01-26 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Takashi, On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 14:45:55 +0100 Takashi Iwai wrote: > > From: Takashi Iwai > Subject: [PATCH v2] ALSA: compress: Disable GET_CODEC_CAPS ioctl for some > architectures > > Some architectures like PowerPC can handle the maximum struct size in > an ioctl only up to 13 bits, and str

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2016-01-26 Thread Vinod Koul
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 01:55:46PM +, Mark Brown wrote: > > though we will need to come up with an alternative solution for the > affected architectures if anyone ends up caring (MIPS or PowerPC might > possibly). Okay I did some rethink on this. So we should be able to make MAX_NUM_CODEC_DES

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2016-01-26 Thread Vinod Koul
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 02:45:55PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote: > Below is the revised one. Acked-by: Vinod Koul Thanks for fixing this up... -- ~Vinod

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2016-01-25 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 02:45:55PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote: > On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 14:10:37 +0100, > Takashi Iwai wrote: > > > > On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 12:41:50 +0100, > > Mark Brown wrote: > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai > > --- > > sound/core/compress_offload.c | 11 +++ > >

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2016-01-25 Thread Mark Brown
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 02:45:55PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote: > Argh, a typo here. I forgot to refresh the patch, sorry. > Below is the revised one. This makes sense to me. Reviwed-by: Mark Brown though we will need to come up with an alternative solution for the affected architectures if an

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2016-01-25 Thread Takashi Iwai
On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 14:10:37 +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 12:41:50 +0100, > Mark Brown wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 10:29:54AM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > > Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > > > diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/Kconfig b/sound/soc/codecs/Kconfig > >

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2016-01-25 Thread Takashi Iwai
On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 12:41:50 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 10:29:54AM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/Kconfig b/sound/soc/codecs/Kconfig > > > index 50693c867e71..ee5f36b9c787 100644 > > > --- a/sound/soc/codecs/K

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2016-01-25 Thread Mark Brown
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 10:29:54AM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote: > Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/Kconfig b/sound/soc/codecs/Kconfig > > index 50693c867e71..ee5f36b9c787 100644 > > --- a/sound/soc/codecs/Kconfig > > +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/Kconfig > > @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ menu

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2016-01-25 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 12:03:54PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote: > On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 11:45:56 +0100, > Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 10:29:54AM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > > On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 03:40:45 +0100, > > > Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > >

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2016-01-25 Thread Takashi Iwai
On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 11:45:56 +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 10:29:54AM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 03:40:45 +0100, > > Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 11:24:42 +1100 Stephen Rothwell > > > wrote: > >

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2016-01-25 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 10:29:54AM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote: > On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 03:40:45 +0100, > Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 11:24:42 +1100 Stephen Rothwell > > wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, 21 Jan 2016 07:38:59 +1100 Stephen Rothwell > > > wrote: > >

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2016-01-25 Thread Takashi Iwai
On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 11:41:12 +0100, Vinod Koul wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 10:29:54AM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 03:40:45 +0100, > > Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 11:24:42 +1100 Stephen Rothwell > > > wrote: > > > > >

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2016-01-25 Thread Vinod Koul
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 10:29:54AM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote: > On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 03:40:45 +0100, > Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 11:24:42 +1100 Stephen Rothwell > > wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, 21 Jan 2016 07:38:59 +1100 Stephen Rothwell > > > wrote: > >

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2016-01-25 Thread Takashi Iwai
On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 10:40:14 +0100, Michael Ellerman wrote: > > On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 10:29 +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 03:40:45 +0100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/Kconfig b/sound/soc/codecs/Kconfig > > > index 50693c867e71..ee5f36b9c787 10064

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2016-01-25 Thread Michael Ellerman
On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 10:29 +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote: > On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 03:40:45 +0100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/Kconfig b/sound/soc/codecs/Kconfig > > index 50693c867e71..ee5f36b9c787 100644 > > --- a/sound/soc/codecs/Kconfig > > +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/Kconfig

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2016-01-25 Thread Takashi Iwai
On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 03:40:45 +0100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 11:24:42 +1100 Stephen Rothwell > wrote: > > > > On Thu, 21 Jan 2016 07:38:59 +1100 Stephen Rothwell > > wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 15:09:47 +0100 Takashi Iwai wrote: > > > > > > > >

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2016-01-21 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 11:24:42 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > On Thu, 21 Jan 2016 07:38:59 +1100 Stephen Rothwell > wrote: > > > > On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 15:09:47 +0100 Takashi Iwai wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 09:51:29 +0100, > > > Takashi Iwai wrote: > > > > > > > > T

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2016-01-21 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 11:24:42 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > On Thu, 21 Jan 2016 07:38:59 +1100 Stephen Rothwell > wrote: > > > > On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 15:09:47 +0100 Takashi Iwai wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 09:51:29 +0100, > > > Takashi Iwai wrote: > > > > > > > > T

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2016-01-21 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, On Thu, 21 Jan 2016 07:38:59 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 15:09:47 +0100 Takashi Iwai wrote: > > > > On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 09:51:29 +0100, > > Takashi Iwai wrote: > > > > > > There are a few ways to fix this, but all are not comfortable. > > > > > > A. Disable

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2016-01-20 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Takashi, On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 15:09:47 +0100 Takashi Iwai wrote: > > On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 09:51:29 +0100, > Takashi Iwai wrote: > > > > There are a few ways to fix this, but all are not comfortable. > > > > A. Disable compress API for powerpc. This also affects alpha, mips and (maybe) sparc.

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2014-11-09 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Thierry, On Thu, 6 Nov 2014 12:24:00 +0100 Thierry Reding wrote: > > I fixed this using the attached patch. I will apply this to linux-next today (unless Andrew beats me to it). -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwells...@canb.auug.org.au pgptxz_cahjEZ.pgp Description: OpenPGP di

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2014-11-06 Thread Thierry Reding
On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 12:24:00PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 07:36:18PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi Andrew, > > > > After merging the akpm tree, today's linux-next build (sparc defconfig) > > failed like this: > > > > mm/slab.c: In function 'slab_alloc': > >

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2014-11-06 Thread Thierry Reding
On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 07:36:18PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > After merging the akpm tree, today's linux-next build (sparc defconfig) > failed like this: > > mm/slab.c: In function 'slab_alloc': > mm/slab.c:3260:4: error: implicit declaration of function 'slab_free' > [-Werr

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2014-08-26 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Don, On Tue, 26 Aug 2014 09:54:17 -0400 Don Zickus wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 05:18:18PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi Andrew, > > > > After merging the akpm tree, today's linux-next build (sparc64 > > defconfig) failed like this: > > > > kernel/built-in.o: In function `proc_

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2014-08-26 Thread Don Zickus
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 05:18:18PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > After merging the akpm tree, today's linux-next build (sparc64 > defconfig) failed like this: > > kernel/built-in.o: In function `proc_dowatchdog': > (.text+0x6a620): undefined reference to > `watchdog_hardlockup_

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2014-07-16 Thread Michal Hocko
On Wed 16-07-14 18:26:41, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > After merging the akpm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > mm/memcontrol.c:5269:12: error: 'CFTYPE_INSANE' undeclared here (not in a > function) >.flags = CFTYPE_INSANE, >

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2014-03-07 Thread Andrew Morton
On Fri, 7 Mar 2014 11:05:49 -0600 (CST) Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Thu, 6 Mar 2014, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > So, by "the whole series" do you mean just/all these: > > > > > > percpu-add-raw_cpu_ops.patch > > > ... > > > sh-replace-__get_cpu_var-uses.patch > > > > Yep. Commented out in h

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2014-03-07 Thread Christoph Lameter
On Thu, 6 Mar 2014, Andrew Morton wrote: > > So, by "the whole series" do you mean just/all these: > > > > percpu-add-raw_cpu_ops.patch > > ... > > sh-replace-__get_cpu_var-uses.patch > > Yep. Commented out in http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/series > > > If so, I will remove them from my tree today

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2014-03-07 Thread Christoph Lameter
On Thu, 6 Mar 2014, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > I have reverted that commit for today. > > I suspect that this whole series may need more review and work. Toss the bits that do not build for now. These can then be handled in individual patches since the overall framework is present. -- To unsubs

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2014-03-06 Thread Andrew Morton
On Fri, 7 Mar 2014 11:57:44 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > On Thu, 6 Mar 2014 13:48:48 -0800 Andrew Morton > wrote: > > > > Yes, I've disabled the whole series for now. Some of these errors > > appear to be caused by compiler mishandling, so it's going to be > > difficult :(

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2014-03-06 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Andrew, On Thu, 6 Mar 2014 13:48:48 -0800 Andrew Morton wrote: > > Yes, I've disabled the whole series for now. Some of these errors > appear to be caused by compiler mishandling, so it's going to be > difficult :( So, by "the whole series" do you mean just/all these: percpu-add-raw_cpu_op

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2014-03-06 Thread Andrew Morton
On Thu, 6 Mar 2014 19:22:34 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > After merging the akpm tree, today's linux-next build (sparc64 defconfig) > failed like this: > > arch/sparc/kernel/time_64.c: In function 'timer_interrupt': > arch/sparc/kernel/time_64.c:735:28: error: lvalue required

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2013-10-02 Thread Frederic Weisbecker
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 02:43:28PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 25 Sep 2013 14:32:14 -0700 (PDT) Hugh Dickins > wrote: > > > On Wed, 25 Sep 2013, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > On Wed, 25 Sep 2013 11:06:43 +1000 Stephen Rothwell > > > wrote: > > > > Hi Andrew, > > > > > > > > After mergi

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2013-09-25 Thread Andrew Morton
On Wed, 25 Sep 2013 14:32:14 -0700 (PDT) Hugh Dickins wrote: > On Wed, 25 Sep 2013, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Wed, 25 Sep 2013 11:06:43 +1000 Stephen Rothwell > > wrote: > > > Hi Andrew, > > > > > > After merging the akpm tree, linux-next builds (powerpc allmodconfig) > > > fail like this: >

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2013-09-25 Thread Hugh Dickins
On Wed, 25 Sep 2013, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 25 Sep 2013 11:06:43 +1000 Stephen Rothwell > wrote: > > Hi Andrew, > > > > After merging the akpm tree, linux-next builds (powerpc allmodconfig) > > fail like this: > > I can't get powerpc to build at all at present: > > CHK include/co

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2013-09-25 Thread Andrew Morton
On Wed, 25 Sep 2013 11:06:43 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > After merging the akpm tree, linux-next builds (powerpc allmodconfig) > fail like this: I can't get powerpc to build at all at present: CHK include/config/kernel.release CHK include/generated/uapi/linux/ve

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2013-09-24 Thread Timur Tabi
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 8:06 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > After merging the akpm tree, linux-next builds (powerpc allmodconfig) > fail like this: > > drivers/tty/ehv_bytechan.c:362:1: error: type defaults to 'int' in > declaration of 'console_initcall' [-Werror=implicit-int] > > C

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2013-06-07 Thread Peng Tao
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 3:52 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, 7 Jun 2013 15:26:56 +0800 Peng Tao wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Stephen Rothwell >> wrote: >> > >> > After merging the akpm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 >> > allmodconfig) failed like this: >> >

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2013-06-07 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi, On Fri, 7 Jun 2013 15:26:56 +0800 Peng Tao wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Stephen Rothwell > wrote: > > > > After merging the akpm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > > > In file included from > > drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/l

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2013-06-07 Thread Peng Tao
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > After merging the akpm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > In file included from > drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/libcfs/linux/libcfs.h:49:0, > from drivers/sta

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2013-02-11 Thread Amir Vadai
On 11/02/2013 09:13, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > After merging the akpm tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc > ppc64_defconfig) failed like this: > > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_rx.c: In function > 'mlx4_en_process_rx_cq': > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_rx.c:62

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2012-12-18 Thread Mel Gorman
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 01:29:07PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > After merging the akpm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > mm/migrate.c: In function 'migrate_misplaced_transhuge_page': > mm/migrate.c:1738:2: error: incompatible type for

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2012-12-10 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > After merging the akpm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > mm/migrate.c: In function 'migrate_misplaced_transhuge_page_put': > mm/migrate.c:1666:2: error: incompatible type for argument 3 of > 'update_mmu_cach

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2012-10-24 Thread Andrew Morton
On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 12:19:39 -0700 Joe Perches wrote: > On Tue, 2012-10-23 at 13:02 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 12:51:29 -0700 > > Joe Perches wrote: > > > > > > btw, what's up with printk_syslog.h? It includes two header files > > > > which it > > > > doesn't need but

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2012-10-24 Thread Joe Perches
On Tue, 2012-10-23 at 13:02 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 12:51:29 -0700 > Joe Perches wrote: > > > > btw, what's up with printk_syslog.h? It includes two header files which > > > it > > > doesn't need but fails to include the two it *does* need: printk_log.h > > > and types

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2012-10-23 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 12:51:29 -0700 Joe Perches wrote: > > btw, what's up with printk_syslog.h? It includes two header files which it > > doesn't need but fails to include the two it *does* need: printk_log.h > > and types.h. > > > > > > printk_syslog.c includes kernel.h (it includes types.h)

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2012-10-23 Thread Joe Perches
On Tue, 2012-10-23 at 12:44 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 14:42:21 +1100 > Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > Hi Andrew, > > > > After merging the akpm tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc > > ppc64_defconfig) failed like this: > > > > kernel/printk/printk_syslog.c: In functio

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2012-10-23 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 14:42:21 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > After merging the akpm tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc > ppc64_defconfig) failed like this: > > kernel/printk/printk_syslog.c: In function 'printk_syslog_print': > kernel/printk/printk_syslog.c:108:3: error: imp

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2012-10-22 Thread Joe Perches
On Tue, 2012-10-23 at 14:42 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > After merging the akpm tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc > ppc64_defconfig) failed like this: > > kernel/printk/printk_syslog.c: In function 'printk_syslog_print': > kernel/printk/printk_syslog.c:108:3: error: impli

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2012-10-01 Thread Andrew Morton
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 11:19:29 -0400 (EDT) Mikulas Patocka wrote: > > - if (!prio_tree_empty(&mapping->i_mmap) || > > + if (!RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&mapping->i_mmap) || > > !list_empty(&mapping->i_mmap_nonlinear)) { > > mutex_unlock(&mapping->i_mmap_mutex); > > percpu_up_

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2012-09-28 Thread Mikulas Patocka
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > After merging the akpm tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc > ppc64_defconfig) failed like this: > > fs/block_dev.c: In function 'set_blocksize': > fs/block_dev.c:135:2: error: implicit declaration of function > 'prio_tree_empty

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2012-09-27 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Andrew, On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 13:33:35 -0700 Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 13:15:58 -0700 > Kees Cook wrote: > > > This is weird -- my original patch doesn't touch audit_get_sessionid() at > > all: > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/kees/linux.git;a=commitdiff;h=7bb

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2012-09-26 Thread Andrew Morton
On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 13:42:05 -0700 Kees Cook wrote: > > +static inline int audit_get_loginuid(struct task_struct *tsk) > > Shouldn't this return kuid_t, due to "userns: Convert the audit > loginuid to be a kuid"? yup, thanks. --- a/include/linux/audit.h~audith-replace-defines-with-c-stubs-fix

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2012-09-26 Thread Kees Cook
Hi, Thanks! This almost matched what I was preparing. Notes below... On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 13:15:58 -0700 > Kees Cook wrote: > >> This is weird -- my original patch doesn't touch audit_get_sessionid() at >> all: >> http://git.kernel.org/?p=

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2012-09-26 Thread Andrew Morton
On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 13:15:58 -0700 Kees Cook wrote: > This is weird -- my original patch doesn't touch audit_get_sessionid() at all: > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/kees/linux.git;a=commitdiff;h=7bbfec58ed33d5e74043530b87992f16da718ba2 That patch has been broken multiple times as thi

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2012-09-26 Thread Kees Cook
Hi, This is weird -- my original patch doesn't touch audit_get_sessionid() at all: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/kees/linux.git;a=commitdiff;h=7bbfec58ed33d5e74043530b87992f16da718ba2 The patch in linux-next (currently e269b4131288512ebfe2adfe69042983cb2e69e5) got mangled to include r

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2012-09-25 Thread Jack Morgenstein
Hi Roland, I am on vacation until next Tuesday -- I'll look at this then. -Jack On Monday 24 September 2012 21:36, Roland Dreier wrote: > On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 7:02 AM, Stephen Rothwell > wrote: > > After merging the akpm tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc > > ppc64_defconfig) failed li

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2012-09-24 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 12:36:43 -0700 Roland Dreier wrote: > On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 7:02 AM, Stephen Rothwell > wrote: > > After merging the akpm tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc > > ppc64_defconfig) failed like this: > > > > drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx4/cm.c: In function 'id_map_alloc': > >

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2012-09-24 Thread Roland Dreier
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 7:02 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > After merging the akpm tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc > ppc64_defconfig) failed like this: > > drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx4/cm.c: In function 'id_map_alloc': > drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx4/cm.c:228:36: error: 'MAX_ID_MASK' undeclared

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2012-09-21 Thread Denys Vlasenko
Hi Stephen, On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 8:26 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > After merging the akpm tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc > ppc64_defconfig) failed like this: > > fs/compat_binfmt_elf.c:22:53: fatal error: asm/sigframe.h: No such file or > directory > > Caused by commi

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2012-09-13 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Andrew, On Thu, 13 Sep 2012 18:31:06 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Here is the chunk of the series file I have: > > idr-rename-max_level-to-max_idr_level.patch > idr-rename-max_level-to-max_idr_level-fix.patch > idr-rename-max_level-to-max_idr_level-fix-fix-2.patch > #NEXT_PATCHES_END >

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2012-09-13 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Zhang, On Thu, 13 Sep 2012 16:46:27 +0800 Zhang Rui wrote: > > I'm new as a git owner, so a stupid question here, > in this case, who should keep this fix? Do I need to do something when > sending pull request? Andrew will take care of it. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwells...

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2012-09-13 Thread Zhang Rui
Hi, all, On 四, 2012-09-13 at 17:44 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > After merging the akpm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c: In function 'get_idr': > drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c:89:14: error: 'MAX_ID_MASK'

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2012-09-13 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Sachin, On Thu, 13 Sep 2012 13:19:48 +0530 Sachin Kamat wrote: > > > - * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but > > + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, > > butX_ID_MASK > > ^ > Looks like a

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2012-09-13 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Andrew, On Thu, 13 Sep 2012 00:56:57 -0700 Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Thu, 13 Sep 2012 17:44:41 +1000 Stephen Rothwell > wrote: > > > After merging the akpm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > > > drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c: In function 'get_

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2012-09-13 Thread Andrew Morton
On Thu, 13 Sep 2012 17:44:41 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > After merging the akpm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c: In function 'get_idr': > drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c:89:14: error: 'MAX_ID_MASK' unde

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2012-09-13 Thread Sachin Kamat
On 13 September 2012 13:14, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > After merging the akpm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c: In function 'get_idr': > drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c:89:14: error: 'MAX_ID_MASK' undeclared (fir

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2012-08-06 Thread Steven Whitehouse
Hi, Thanks for the patch - I'd not realised that I'd used the wrong function there... it is fixed now in the GFS2 -nmw tree, Steve. On Sun, 2012-08-05 at 22:04 -0700, Michel Lespinasse wrote: > gfs2 calls RB_EMPTY_NODE() to check if nodes are not on an rbtree. > The corresponding initialization

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2012-08-05 Thread Michel Lespinasse
gfs2 calls RB_EMPTY_NODE() to check if nodes are not on an rbtree. The corresponding initialization function is RB_CLEAR_NODE(). rb_init_node() was never clearly defined and is going away. Signed-off-by: Michel Lespinasse --- fs/gfs2/rgrp.c |5 ++--- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 delet

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2012-08-05 Thread Michel Lespinasse
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 8:43 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Caused by commit 5599fe1ab023 ("rbtree: empty nodes have no color") from > the akpm tree interacting with commit cde7c325077b ("GFS2: Add structure > to contain rgrp, bitmap, offset tuple") from the gfs2 tree. > > I have applied the followi

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree

2012-07-31 Thread Michel Lespinasse
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 9:40 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > After merging the akpm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > net/ceph/osd_client.c: In function 'ceph_osdc_alloc_request': > net/ceph/osd_client.c:216:2: error: implicit declaration of

  1   2   >