On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 5:37 PM Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 5:06 PM Jessica Yu wrote:
> >
> > +++ Stephen Rothwell [10/02/21 08:50 +1100]:
> > >Hi Jessica,
> > >
> > >On Tue, 9 Feb 2021 16:16:20 +0100 Jessica Yu wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hmm, these errors don't look like it's r
+++ Stephen Rothwell [10/02/21 23:21 +1100]:
Hi Jessica,
On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 09:06:48 +0100 Jessica Yu wrote:
Sorry, by "feature" I meant CONFIG_TRIM_UNUSED_KSYMS. This config
option was introduced around v4.7. If simply enabling it produces
these compilation errors I was wondering if it ever
Hi Jessica,
On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 09:06:48 +0100 Jessica Yu wrote:
>
> Sorry, by "feature" I meant CONFIG_TRIM_UNUSED_KSYMS. This config
> option was introduced around v4.7. If simply enabling it produces
> these compilation errors I was wondering if it ever built properly on
> powerpc.
Ah, of co
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 5:06 PM Jessica Yu wrote:
>
> +++ Stephen Rothwell [10/02/21 08:50 +1100]:
> >Hi Jessica,
> >
> >On Tue, 9 Feb 2021 16:16:20 +0100 Jessica Yu wrote:
> >>
> >> Hmm, these errors don't look like it's related to that particular commit.
> >> I was
> >
> >I found this commit b
+++ Stephen Rothwell [10/02/21 08:50 +1100]:
Hi Jessica,
On Tue, 9 Feb 2021 16:16:20 +0100 Jessica Yu wrote:
Hmm, these errors don't look like it's related to that particular commit. I was
I found this commit by bisection and then tested by reverting it.
Before this commit, CONFIG_TRIM_UNU
Hi Jessica,
On Tue, 9 Feb 2021 16:16:20 +0100 Jessica Yu wrote:
>
> Hmm, these errors don't look like it's related to that particular commit. I
> was
I found this commit by bisection and then tested by reverting it.
Before this commit, CONFIG_TRIM_UNUSED_KSYMS would not be set in the
allyescon
On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 04:16:20PM +0100, Jessica Yu wrote:
> Hmm, these errors don't look like it's related to that particular commit. I
> was
> able to reproduce these weird autoksym errors even without any modules-next
> patches applied, and on a clean v5.11-rc7 tree.
I OTOH can't reproduce it
+++ Stephen Rothwell [09/02/21 21:08 +1100]:
Hi all,
After merging the modules tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
In file included from include/linux/export.h:123,
from include/linux/linkage.h:7,
from arch/powerpc/include/asm/
Mark Brown writes:
> Hi Rusty,
>
> After merging the modules tree, today's linux-next x86 allmodconfig build
> (20151201) failed like this:
>
> /home/broonie/next/next/arch/x86/kernel/livepatch.c: In function
> 'klp_write_module_reloc':
> /home/broonie/next/next/arch/x86/kernel/livepatch.c:75:22
Stephen Rothwell writes:
> Hi Rusty,
>
> After merging the modules tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> In file included from include/linux/kexec.h:26:0,
> from include/linux/crash_dump.h:5,
> from arch/powerpc/platforms
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 2:54 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Rusty,
>
> After merging the modules tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allnoconfig) failed like this:
I promise I'll build with all[no|mod|yes]config next time! ;-)
Thanks for catching this one too.
>
> kernel/params.c:628:6:
Hi Dan,
On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 08:57:06 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 14:18:44 -0400 Dan Streetman wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 9:37 PM, Stephen Rothwell
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > After merging the modules tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > > allmodconfig)
Hi Dan,
On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 14:18:44 -0400 Dan Streetman wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 9:37 PM, Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> >
> > After merging the modules tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> that's weird. Are you sure it failed during allmodcon
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 9:37 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Rusty,
>
> After merging the modules tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
that's weird. Are you sure it failed during allmodconfig? I can see
why it would fail like that if CONFIG_MODULES ins't def
Hi Rusty,
On Thu, 07 Aug 2014 22:37:50 +0930 Rusty Russell wrote:
>
> Stephen Rothwell writes:
> > Hi Rusty,
> >
> > On Thu, 07 Aug 2014 21:07:20 +0930 Rusty Russell
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Ah, crap. I really hate that macro magic :(
> >>
> >> I amended to the minimal fix, so we can pretend tha
Stephen Rothwell writes:
> Hi Rusty,
>
> On Thu, 07 Aug 2014 21:07:20 +0930 Rusty Russell
> wrote:
>>
>> Ah, crap. I really hate that macro magic :(
>>
>> I amended to the minimal fix, so we can pretend that never happened.
>
> How about arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-dump.c as well?
Hmm
Hi Rusty,
On Thu, 07 Aug 2014 21:07:20 +0930 Rusty Russell wrote:
>
> Ah, crap. I really hate that macro magic :(
>
> I amended to the minimal fix, so we can pretend that never happened.
How about arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-dump.c as well?
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Stephen Rothwell writes:
> Hi Rusty,
>
> After merging the modules tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-elog.c:85:28: error: macro "__ATTR_RO"
> passed 2 arguments, but takes just 1
> __ATTR_RO(id, elog_id_show);
A
Stephen Rothwell writes:
> Hi Rusty,
>
> After merging the modules tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
Thanks, I've sent off a fix for that file, and asked Stewart for an
Ack:
Subject: arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-elog.c: fix world-writable sysfs
Stephen Rothwell writes:
> Hi Rusty,
>
> After merging the modules tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
Hmm, I sent Greg KH a separate patch for staging, which rips these out
altogether. He said he'd apply it "in a bit".
I see it hasn't hit mainline yet, so h
Stanislaw Gruszka writes:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 03:10:46PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> After merging the modules tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
>> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>>
>> drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-drv.c:1196:1: error: invalid suffix
>> "n_disabletype__8" o
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 03:10:46PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> After merging the modules tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-drv.c:1196:1: error: invalid suffix
> "n_disabletype__8" on integer constant
> drivers/net/wi
Stephen Rothwell writes:
> Hi Rusty,
>
> After merging the modules tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
As this is in Andrew's tree, I've reverted it from my modules-next tree.
Thanks,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lin
23 matches
Mail list logo