Re: linux-next: manual merge of the scsi-mkp tree with Linus' tree

2020-09-10 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, On Wed, 2 Sep 2020 15:12:35 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Today's linux-next merge of the scsi-mkp tree got a conflict in: > > drivers/scsi/aacraid/aachba.c > > between commit: > > df561f6688fe ("treewide: Use fallthrough pseudo-keyword") > > from Linus' tree and commit: > >

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the scsi-mkp tree with Linus' tree

2020-06-10 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, On Wed, 10 Jun 2020 12:17:07 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Today's linux-next merge of the scsi-mkp tree got a conflict in: > > drivers/scsi/sr.c > > between commit: > > a711d91cd97e ("block: add a cdrom_device_info pointer to struct gendisk") > > from Linus' tree and commit:

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the scsi-mkp tree with Linus' tree

2019-02-11 Thread John Garry
On 11/02/2019 04:31, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the scsi-mkp tree got a conflict in: drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v3_hw.c between commit: 7bb25a89aad2 ("scsi: hisi_sas: Set protection parameters prior to adding SCSI host") from Linus' tree and commit:

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the scsi-mkp tree with Linus' tree

2019-02-07 Thread James Smart
On 2/6/2019 8:44 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the scsi-mkp tree got a conflict in: drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nvme.c between commit: 7961cba6f7d8 ("scsi: lpfc: nvme: avoid hang / use-after-free when destroying localport") from Linus' tree and commit:

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the scsi-mkp tree with Linus' tree

2018-12-09 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, On Mon, 10 Dec 2018 17:17:16 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This See below :-) Also I accidentally left the declaration of "status" in __qla2x00_abort_all_cmds(). -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell diff --cc drivers/scsi/qla2

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the scsi-mkp tree with Linus' tree

2018-07-11 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, On Wed, 11 Jul 2018 14:04:57 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Today's linux-next merge of the scsi-mkp tree got a conflict in: > > MAINTAINERS > > between commit: > > 54e45716a84a ("scsi: remove NCR_D700 driver") > > from Linus' tree and commit: > > 01a21986f8ed ("MAINTAINERS

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the scsi-mkp tree with Linus' tree

2017-11-30 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Martin, On Thu, 30 Nov 2017 21:14:25 -0500 "Martin K. Petersen" wrote: > > > That should have been arcmsr_set_iop_datetime, sorry. I will fix it > > tomorrow if you haven't rebased onto v4.15-rc1 by then :-) > > I had such a huge pile of patches in the queue that I was compelled to > begi

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the scsi-mkp tree with Linus' tree

2017-11-30 Thread Martin K. Petersen
Stephen, > That should have been arcmsr_set_iop_datetime, sorry. I will fix it > tomorrow if you haven't rebased onto v4.15-rc1 by then :-) I had such a huge pile of patches in the queue that I was compelled to begin 4.16 early. I had meant to rebase that tree to rc1 before switching my for-nex

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the scsi-mkp tree with Linus' tree

2017-11-29 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Martin On Thu, 30 Nov 2017 12:51:21 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > + static void arcmsr_init_set_datetime_timer(struct AdapterControlBlock *pacb) > + { > -init_timer(&pacb->refresh_timer); > ++timer_setup(&pacb->eternal_timer, arcmsr_request_device_map, 0);