Re: linux-next: manual merge of the security tree with Linus' tree

2019-08-20 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Just adding a couple of more Cc's On Wed, 21 Aug 2019 13:01:06 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Today's linux-next merge of the security tree got conflicts in: > > arch/s390/configs/debug_defconfig > arch/s390/configs/defconfig > > between commit: > > 3361f3193c74 ("s390: upd

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the security tree with Linus' tree

2013-01-20 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Mimi, On Sun, 20 Jan 2013 22:10:23 -0500 Mimi Zohar wrote: > > Sorry Stephen, the merged result should look like what's contained in > linux-integrity/next-upstreamed-patches: > > int ima_module_check(struct file *file) > { > if (!file) { > if ((ima_appraise & IMA_APPR

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the security tree with Linus' tree

2013-01-20 Thread Mimi Zohar
On Mon, 2013-01-21 at 13:12 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi James, > > Today's linux-next merge of the security tree got a conflict in > security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c between commit a7f2a366f623 ("ima: > fallback to MODULE_SIG_ENFORCE for existing kernel module syscall") from > Linus' tree

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the security tree with Linus' tree

2012-10-16 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi James, On Wed, 17 Oct 2012 11:41:57 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Today's linux-next merge of the security tree got a conflict in > net/dns_resolver/dns_key.c between commit c6089735e724 ("userns: net: > Call key_alloc with GLOBAL_ROOT_UID, GLOBAL_ROOT_GID instead of 0, 0") > from Linus'