Re: linux-next build status

2008-02-15 Thread Michael Ellerman
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 12:24 PM, Chris Snook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Initial status can be seen here > > http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/branch/9/ (I hope to make a better > > URL soon). Suggestions for more compiler/config combinations ar

Re: linux-next build status

2008-02-14 Thread Randy Dunlap
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 21:53:48 -0500 Chris Snook wrote: > Tony Breeds wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 08:24:27PM -0500, Chris Snook wrote: > >> Stephen Rothwell wrote: > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> Initial status can be seen here > >>> http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/branch/9/ (I hope to make a b

Re: linux-next build status

2008-02-14 Thread Chris Snook
Tony Breeds wrote: On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 08:24:27PM -0500, Chris Snook wrote: Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, Initial status can be seen here http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/branch/9/ (I hope to make a better URL soon). Suggestions for more compiler/config combinations are welcome, but

Re: linux-next build status

2008-02-14 Thread Tony Breeds
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 08:24:27PM -0500, Chris Snook wrote: > Stephen Rothwell wrote: > >Hi all, > > > >Initial status can be seen here > >http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/branch/9/ (I hope to make a better > >URL soon). Suggestions for more compiler/config combinations are > >welcome, but we

Re: linux-next build status

2008-02-14 Thread Chris Snook
Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, Initial status can be seen here http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/branch/9/ (I hope to make a better URL soon). Suggestions for more compiler/config combinations are welcome, but we can't necessarily commit to fulfilling all you wishes. :-) i386 allmodconfi

Re: linux-next build status

2008-02-14 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 11:42:53AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Initial status can be seen here > http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/branch/9/ (I hope to make a better > URL soon). Suggestions for more compiler/config combinations are > welcome, but we can't necessarily commit to