Re: lpc18xx: undefined Kconfig option ARCH_LPC18XX

2015-05-13 Thread Linus Walleij
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Valentin Rothberg wrote: > [Me]: >> The answer to whether a certain maintainer will dare to do so >> or not is per individual preference. The crucial point is that >> "time savings" trumps "nothing can ever go wrong". > > I understand your point completely. Howeve

Re: lpc18xx: undefined Kconfig option ARCH_LPC18XX

2015-05-12 Thread Valentin Rothberg
Hi Linus, thanks a lot for taking your time to give such detailed answer, I appreciate that. On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 02:03:33PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Valentin Rothberg > wrote: > > On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Linus Walleij > > wrote: > >> On Wed,

Re: lpc18xx: undefined Kconfig option ARCH_LPC18XX

2015-05-12 Thread Linus Walleij
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Linus Walleij wrote: > - (B) Creating an immutable branch pulled into both trees, which > is better since it means the same hash is in both trees PS: This may seem idea but it's not. It means several subsystem-disparate patches will appear in several pull reque

Re: lpc18xx: undefined Kconfig option ARCH_LPC18XX

2015-05-12 Thread Linus Walleij
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Valentin Rothberg wrote: > On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Linus Walleij > wrote: >> On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Valentin Rothberg >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Joachim, >>> >>> there are two of your commits [1, 2] in today's linux-next (i.e., >>> next-20150506).

Re: lpc18xx: undefined Kconfig option ARCH_LPC18XX

2015-05-12 Thread Valentin Rothberg
Hi Linus, On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Valentin Rothberg > wrote: > >> Hi Joachim, >> >> there are two of your commits [1, 2] in today's linux-next (i.e., >> next-20150506). Both of them add Kconfig options that depend on >> ARCH_LPC1

Re: lpc18xx: undefined Kconfig option ARCH_LPC18XX

2015-05-12 Thread Linus Walleij
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Valentin Rothberg wrote: > Hi Joachim, > > there are two of your commits [1, 2] in today's linux-next (i.e., > next-20150506). Both of them add Kconfig options that depend on > ARCH_LPC18XX, which is not defined in Kconfig, see: > > + depends on OF && (ARCH

Re: lpc18xx: undefined Kconfig option ARCH_LPC18XX

2015-05-06 Thread Joachim Eastwood
On 6 May 2015 at 10:02, Valentin Rothberg wrote: > Hi Joachim, > > there are two of your commits [1, 2] in today's linux-next (i.e., > next-20150506). Both of them add Kconfig options that depend on > ARCH_LPC18XX, which is not defined in Kconfig, see: > > + depends on OF && (ARCH_LPC18XX |