Re: m68knommu compile error

2008-02-10 Thread Greg Ungerer
Martin Schwidefsky wrote: On Sat, 2008-02-09 at 11:21 +0100, Martin Schwidefsky wrote: On Sat, 2008-02-09 at 00:25 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: Commit 2f569afd9ced9ebec9a6eb3dbf6f83429be0a7b4 breaks m68knommu: Does the patch below fixes the problem? I tried to cross compile for m68knommu but it

Re: m68knommu compile error

2008-02-09 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Feb 9, 2008 5:58 AM, Martin Schwidefsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 2008-02-09 at 11:21 +0100, Martin Schwidefsky wrote: > > On Sat, 2008-02-09 at 00:25 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > Commit 2f569afd9ced9ebec9a6eb3dbf6f83429be0a7b4 breaks m68knommu: > > > > Does the patch below fixes t

Re: m68knommu compile error

2008-02-09 Thread Martin Schwidefsky
On Sat, 2008-02-09 at 11:21 +0100, Martin Schwidefsky wrote: > On Sat, 2008-02-09 at 00:25 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > Commit 2f569afd9ced9ebec9a6eb3dbf6f83429be0a7b4 breaks m68knommu: > > Does the patch below fixes the problem? I tried to cross compile for > m68knommu but it seems like you need

Re: m68knommu compile error

2008-02-09 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 11:21:12AM +0100, Martin Schwidefsky wrote: > On Sat, 2008-02-09 at 00:25 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > Commit 2f569afd9ced9ebec9a6eb3dbf6f83429be0a7b4 breaks m68knommu: > > Does the patch below fixes the problem? Thanks, it fixes it. > I tried to cross compile for > m68k

Re: m68knommu compile error

2008-02-09 Thread Martin Schwidefsky
On Sat, 2008-02-09 at 00:25 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Commit 2f569afd9ced9ebec9a6eb3dbf6f83429be0a7b4 breaks m68knommu: Does the patch below fixes the problem? I tried to cross compile for m68knommu but it seems like you need a special m68k compiler to get it compile all the way through. With th