Hi André,
Sorry for the delay, I missed the thread on this issue.
On 03/07/2020 11:49, André Przywara wrote:
> On 03/07/2020 06:38, kernelci.org bot wrote:
>
> Hi Guillaume,
>
> is this report legit? The situation didn't change from Monday, I just
> repeated the test with mainline compared to m
On 06/07/2020 13:49, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Jul 05, 2020 at 07:12:58PM -0700, kernelci.org bot wrote:
>> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>> * This automated bisection report was sent to you on the basis *
>> * that you may be involved with the brea
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 05, 2020 at 07:12:58PM -0700, kernelci.org bot wrote:
> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
> * This automated bisection report was sent to you on the basis *
> * that you may be involved with the breaking commit it has *
> * found. No manual in
On 03/07/2020 06:38, kernelci.org bot wrote:
Hi Guillaume,
is this report legit? The situation didn't change from Monday, I just
repeated the test with mainline compared to my patch reverted.
What is the actual failure here? You pointed to:
<2>GIC CPU mask not found - kernel will fail to boot.
b
4 matches
Mail list logo
