Re: next/mmotm unbootable on G5: irqdomain

2012-07-23 Thread Grant Likely
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 9:21 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Mon, 2012-07-23 at 16:32 -0600, Grant Likely wrote: >> > As-is I'm backing off from the linear/legacy/tree merge patch as just >> > too risky. I've already pulled that stuff out of linux-next. >> >> Can I pull you pseries fix into

Re: next/mmotm unbootable on G5: irqdomain

2012-07-23 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Mon, 2012-07-23 at 16:32 -0600, Grant Likely wrote: > > As-is I'm backing off from the linear/legacy/tree merge patch as just > > too risky. I've already pulled that stuff out of linux-next. > > Can I pull you pseries fix into my tree (my preference), or do I need > to rebase on top of yours?

Re: next/mmotm unbootable on G5: irqdomain

2012-07-23 Thread Grant Likely
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Grant Likely wrote: > On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt > wrote: >> On Mon, 2012-07-23 at 01:59 -0600, Grant Likely wrote: >>> My tree must be rebased to eliminate bisect breakage. The existing >>> commits in my tree have the breakage, and fi

Re: next/mmotm unbootable on G5: irqdomain

2012-07-23 Thread Grant Likely
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Mon, 2012-07-23 at 01:59 -0600, Grant Likely wrote: >> My tree must be rebased to eliminate bisect breakage. The existing >> commits in my tree have the breakage, and fiddling with the merge >> order doesn't affect that. I don't w

Re: next/mmotm unbootable on G5: irqdomain

2012-07-23 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Mon, 2012-07-23 at 01:59 -0600, Grant Likely wrote: > My tree must be rebased to eliminate bisect breakage. The existing > commits in my tree have the breakage, and fiddling with the merge > order doesn't affect that. I don't want to rebase though. The safest > approach (smallest window of break

Re: next/mmotm unbootable on G5: irqdomain

2012-07-23 Thread Grant Likely
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 8:45 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Sat, 2012-07-21 at 19:47 -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote: >> I have to revert the patch below from mmotm 2012-07-20-16-30 or >> next-20120720 in order to boot on the PowerPC G5: otherwise it >> freezes before switching to the framebuffe

Re: next/mmotm unbootable on G5: irqdomain

2012-07-23 Thread Hugh Dickins
On Mon, 23 Jul 2012, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Sat, 2012-07-21 at 19:47 -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote: > > I have to revert the patch below from mmotm 2012-07-20-16-30 or > > next-20120720 in order to boot on the PowerPC G5: otherwise it > > freezes before switching to the framebuffer console

Re: next/mmotm unbootable on G5: irqdomain

2012-07-22 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Sat, 2012-07-21 at 19:47 -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote: > I have to revert the patch below from mmotm 2012-07-20-16-30 or > next-20120720 in order to boot on the PowerPC G5: otherwise it > freezes before switching to the framebuffer console - but I'm > not certain where because that initial console

Re: next/mmotm unbootable on G5: irqdomain

2012-07-22 Thread Hugh Dickins
On Sun, 22 Jul 2012, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Sat, 2012-07-21 at 19:47 -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote: > > I have to revert the patch below from mmotm 2012-07-20-16-30 or > > next-20120720 in order to boot on the PowerPC G5: otherwise it > > freezes before switching to the framebuffer console

Re: next/mmotm unbootable on G5: irqdomain

2012-07-22 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Sat, 2012-07-21 at 19:47 -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote: > I have to revert the patch below from mmotm 2012-07-20-16-30 or > next-20120720 in order to boot on the PowerPC G5: otherwise it > freezes before switching to the framebuffer console - but I'm > not certain where because that initial console