On Thu, 19 Feb 2015, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:54:40AM -0500, Vince Weaver wrote:
>
> > [ 7938.802139] [] perf_tp_event+0xc4/0x210
> > [ 7938.861174] [] perf_trace_lock+0x12a/0x160
> > [ 7938.882197] [] lock_release+0x130/0x260
> > [ 7938.888754] [] _raw_spin_unlock_i
On Thu, 19 Feb 2015, Vince Weaver wrote:
> I have to take that back, it turns out the Cortex-A9 machine was wedged
> for over a day, I just hadn't noticed because it hadn't dumped any kind
> of message about the problem. Hmm.
This turns out to be the find_get_context() bug that has been fixed i
On Thu, 19 Feb 2015, Vince Weaver wrote:
> I also have a core2 and a Cortex-A9 machine fuzzing
> away and they've been at it a week now without turning up anything.
I have to take that back, it turns out the Cortex-A9 machine was wedged
for over a day, I just hadn't noticed because it hadn't du
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:54:40AM -0500, Vince Weaver wrote:
> [ 7938.802139] [] perf_tp_event+0xc4/0x210
> [ 7938.861174] [] perf_trace_lock+0x12a/0x160
> [ 7938.882197] [] lock_release+0x130/0x260
> [ 7938.888754] [] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x24/0x40
> [ 7938.896510] [] do_send_sig_inf
On Thu, 19 Feb 2015, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:54:40AM -0500, Vince Weaver wrote:
> >
> > Another bug found by the perf_fuzzer(). I think this one is different
> > than the one I sent the other day, it looks like something is going
> > very wrong in perf_callchain().
> >
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:54:40AM -0500, Vince Weaver wrote:
>
> Another bug found by the perf_fuzzer(). I think this one is different
> than the one I sent the other day, it looks like something is going
> very wrong in perf_callchain().
>
> This one is reasonably reproducible, if there's any
6 matches
Mail list logo
