On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 05:00:11PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 04:32:13PM +, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 10:17:25AM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > > Ok, I couldn't get a clean merge of that old branch on top of your
> > > 5.10-rc1 tree, so I can't give it
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 07:33:59PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> That worked too, I'll send a patch for this for the top of your branch
> to resolve this issue as a response to this email.
In the old branch I had a scripted conversion of all proc_read instances
that point to seq_read to use seq_read_ite
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 04:32:13PM +, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 10:17:25AM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > Ok, I couldn't get a clean merge of that old branch on top of your
> > 5.10-rc1 tree, so I can't give it a run-through. If you have an updated
> > series you want me to
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 04:32:13PM +, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 10:17:25AM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > Ok, I couldn't get a clean merge of that old branch on top of your
> > 5.10-rc1 tree, so I can't give it a run-through. If you have an updated
> > series you want me to
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 10:17:25AM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> Ok, I couldn't get a clean merge of that old branch on top of your
> 5.10-rc1 tree, so I can't give it a run-through. If you have an updated
> series you want me to test, I'll be glad to do so.
Can you give this branch a spin?
http://git
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 09:14:20AM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 08:07:45AM +, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 08:55:41AM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > > This is just a test, part of the bionic test suite to verify that bionic
> > > is working properly, and is
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 09:14:20AM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> Luckily /proc/cpuinfo seems to use the seq_file interface, so this
> series would work for that.
>
> What's the odds of this series getting into 5.10-final? I'll go run it
> through the Android build system right now to see if it fixes th
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 08:07:45AM +, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 08:55:41AM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > This is just a test, part of the bionic test suite to verify that bionic
> > is working properly, and is run on new kernels as a verification that
> > nothing functional
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 08:55:41AM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> This is just a test, part of the bionic test suite to verify that bionic
> is working properly, and is run on new kernels as a verification that
> nothing functional broke in the kernel update.
>
> I don't know about "real applications" ye
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 07:49:11AM +, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 07:48:32AM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 03:40:27PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > The most interesting - to me - change here is Christoph's setf_fs()
> > > removal (it got merged th
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 07:48:32AM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 03:40:27PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > The most interesting - to me - change here is Christoph's setf_fs()
> > removal (it got merged through Al Viro, as you can see in my mergelog
> > below). It's not a _huge_
11 matches
Mail list logo
