On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 10:55:11AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 11:59 PM, Paul E. McKenney
> wrote:
>
> > rcu: Fix day-one dyntick-idle stall-warning bug
>
> As mentioned in another thread this solves the same problem for ux500.
> Reported/Tested-by: Linus Walleij
>
>
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 11:59 PM, Paul E. McKenney
wrote:
> rcu: Fix day-one dyntick-idle stall-warning bug
As mentioned in another thread this solves the same problem for ux500.
Reported/Tested-by: Linus Walleij
But now it appears that this commit didn't make it into v3.6 so
it definately nee
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 09:54:00PM +, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Sep 2012, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 10:20:19PM +, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> > > On Sat, 22 Sep 2012, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > >
> > > > This thing has been in the kernel since about 2004, no
On Sat, 22 Sep 2012, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 10:20:19PM +, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> > On Sat, 22 Sep 2012, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >
> > > This thing has been in the kernel since about 2004, not sure why you
> > > didn't hit it earlier.
> >
> > One other data point
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 03:11:34PM +0530, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 3:29 AM, Paul E. McKenney
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 01:10:43PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >> On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 06:42:08PM +, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> >> > On Fri, 21 Sep 2012, Pau
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 3:29 AM, Paul E. McKenney
wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 01:10:43PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 06:42:08PM +, Paul Walmsley wrote:
>> > On Fri, 21 Sep 2012, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
[...]
>
> And here is a patch. I am still having troub
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 07:55:50AM +, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Sep 2012, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 10:25:59PM +, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> >
> > > The recent tests here have been on Pandaboard, which is dual-CPU, but my
> > > recollection is that I also
On Sat, 22 Sep 2012, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 10:25:59PM +, Paul Walmsley wrote:
>
> > The recent tests here have been on Pandaboard, which is dual-CPU, but my
> > recollection is that I also observed the warnings on a single-core
> > Beagleboard. Will re-test.
>
On Sat, 22 Sep 2012, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> Very cool, thank you for your testing efforts!!!
You're welcome.
> May I apply your Tested-by to this patch?
Please do:
Tested-by: Paul Walmsley # OMAP4430
Am testing on OMAP3730 (single-core) now.
- Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: sen
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 01:42:10AM +, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> Hi Paul
>
> On Sat, 22 Sep 2012, Paul Walmsley wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 22 Sep 2012, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >
> > > And here is a patch. I am still having trouble reproducing the problem,
> > > but figured that I should avoid seria
Hi Paul
On Sat, 22 Sep 2012, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Sep 2012, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> > And here is a patch. I am still having trouble reproducing the problem,
> > but figured that I should avoid serializing things.
>
> Thanks, testing this now on v3.6-rc6.
Looks like you solve
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 10:20:19PM +, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> Hi Paul
>
> On Sat, 22 Sep 2012, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> > Strangely enough, I believe that I have inadvertently fixed this in
> > my -rcu tree:
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-rcu.git rcu/ne
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 10:25:59PM +, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Sep 2012, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> > And here is a patch. I am still having trouble reproducing the problem,
> > but figured that I should avoid serializing things.
>
> Thanks, testing this now on v3.6-rc6.
Very cool
On Sat, 22 Sep 2012, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> And here is a patch. I am still having trouble reproducing the problem,
> but figured that I should avoid serializing things.
Thanks, testing this now on v3.6-rc6. One question though about the patch
description:
> All this begs the question of e
Hi Paul
On Sat, 22 Sep 2012, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> Strangely enough, I believe that I have inadvertently fixed this in
> my -rcu tree:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-rcu.git rcu/next
>
> Nevertheless, if you get a chance to try it, I would be interested to
>
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 01:10:43PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 06:42:08PM +, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> > On Fri, 21 Sep 2012, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >
> > > Could you please point me to a recipe for creating a minimal userspace?
> > > Just in case it is the userspa
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 06:16:15PM +, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> Hi Paul
>
> On Fri, 21 Sep 2012, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> > I am wondering if your system somehow figured out how to start a grace
> > period that had no RCU callbacks waiting for it. If that happened,
> > then a CONFIG_NO_HZ=y
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 06:42:08PM +, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Sep 2012, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> > Could you please point me to a recipe for creating a minimal userspace?
> > Just in case it is the userspac erather than the architecture/hardware
> > that makes the difference.
>
>
On Fri, 21 Sep 2012, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> Could you please point me to a recipe for creating a minimal userspace?
> Just in case it is the userspac erather than the architecture/hardware
> that makes the difference.
Tony's suggestion is pretty good. Note that there may also be differences
Hi Paul
On Fri, 21 Sep 2012, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> I am wondering if your system somehow figured out how to start a grace
> period that had no RCU callbacks waiting for it. If that happened,
> then a CONFIG_NO_HZ=y system could in theory get into a state where all
> CPUs are in dyntick-idle
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 05:45:12PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> 2012/9/22 Paul E. McKenney :
> > On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 01:31:49PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> >> * Paul E. McKenney [120921 12:58]:
> >> >
> >> > Just to make sure I understand the combinations:
> >> >
> >> > o All stalls
2012/9/22 Paul E. McKenney :
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 01:31:49PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>> * Paul E. McKenney [120921 12:58]:
>> >
>> > Just to make sure I understand the combinations:
>> >
>> > o All stalls have happened when running a minimal userspace.
>> > o CONFIG_NO_HZ=n suppresses
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 10:41:14PM +, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Sep 2012, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 05:47:31PM +, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> >
> > > I built an OMAP kernel from Linus' commit
> > > 4651afbbae968772efd6dc4ba461cba9b49bb9d8 ("Merge branch 'for
On Fri, 21 Sep 2012, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 05:47:31PM +, Paul Walmsley wrote:
>
> > I built an OMAP kernel from Linus' commit
> > 4651afbbae968772efd6dc4ba461cba9b49bb9d8 ("Merge branch 'for-3.6-fixes' of
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/wq").
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 12:57:17PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 07:11:14PM +, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> > On Fri, 21 Sep 2012, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
[ . . . ]
> > > I may take your advice of remote access to a Panda board, though that
> > > is likely to take a bit o
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 01:31:49PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Paul E. McKenney [120921 12:58]:
> >
> > Just to make sure I understand the combinations:
> >
> > o All stalls have happened when running a minimal userspace.
> > o CONFIG_NO_HZ=n suppresses the stalls.
> > o CONFIG_RCU_FAS
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 05:47:31PM +, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> Hi Paul
>
> On Thu, 20 Sep 2012, Paul Walmsley wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 20 Sep 2012, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >
> > > Paul Walmsley, please let me know if the config below doesn't clear things
> > > up for you or if there is some reaso
* Paul E. McKenney [120921 12:58]:
>
> Just to make sure I understand the combinations:
>
> o All stalls have happened when running a minimal userspace.
> o CONFIG_NO_HZ=n suppresses the stalls.
> o CONFIG_RCU_FAST_NO_HZ (which depends on CONFIG_NO_HZ=y) has
> no observable eff
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 07:11:14PM +, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Sep 2012, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 06:08:59PM +, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> >
> > > As far as I know, our only idle entry point is in
> > > arch/arm/common/process.c:cpu_idle().
> >
> > In m
On Fri, 21 Sep 2012, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 06:08:59PM +, Paul Walmsley wrote:
>
> > As far as I know, our only idle entry point is in
> > arch/arm/common/process.c:cpu_idle().
>
> In mainline, this is arch/arm/kernel/process.c, correct?
Indeed; sorry about that,
Hi
Just did a test with CONFIG_NO_HZ=n, and no rcu_sched stall messages
appeared for 60 minutes.
Following is the diff from omap2plus_defconfig.
- Paul
--- .config 2012-09-21 12:51:19.114938954 -0600
+++ .testconfig 2012-09-21 12:51:15.686926318 -0600
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@
# Timers subsystem
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 06:08:59PM +, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> cc Frederic Weisbecker - context is here:
>
>http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=134749030206016&w=2
>
> On Thu, 20 Sep 2012, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> > Fair point. I am wondering whether there is some path into the idle
>
cc Frederic Weisbecker - context is here:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=134749030206016&w=2
On Thu, 20 Sep 2012, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> Fair point. I am wondering whether there is some path into the idle
> loop that somehow avoids telling RCU that the CPU has in face entered
> idle.
On Fri, 21 Sep 2012, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> The config used was 'omap2plus_defconfig', and enabled CONFIG_CPU_IDLE
> by hand.
One other thing I forgot to mention - CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_INFO was
enabled by hand also. Below is the diff between omap2plus_defconfig and
the config that was used h
Hi Paul
On Thu, 20 Sep 2012, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Sep 2012, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> > Paul Walmsley, please let me know if the config below doesn't clear things
> > up for you or if there is some reason why this config is infeasible.
>
> Will certainly test it here once things s
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 10:47:25PM +, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Sep 2012, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 09:49:13PM +, Bruce, Becky wrote:
> >
> > > OK, people, you can stop heckling me about "sent from my iPhone" - I'm in
> > > the wilds of rural Louisiana
On Thu, 20 Sep 2012, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 09:49:13PM +, Bruce, Becky wrote:
>
> > OK, people, you can stop heckling me about "sent from my iPhone" - I'm in
> > the wilds of rural Louisiana with really bad internet service and was
> > trying to work on my phone (b
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 09:49:13PM +, Bruce, Becky wrote:
>
> On Sep 20, 2012, at 2:56 AM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, 19 Sep 2012, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 06:52:10PM +, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Paul E. McK
On Sep 20, 2012, at 2:56 AM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 19 Sep 2012, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 06:52:10PM +, Paul Walmsley wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>>
Subodh Nijsure (also CCed) reported something that might be
I'll give it a try on my panda later today.
B
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 20, 2012, at 2:56 AM, "Paul Walmsley" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 19 Sep 2012, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 06:52:10PM +, Paul Walmsley wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Paul E. McKenney wrote
Hi,
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 06:52:10PM +, Paul Walmsley wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> > > Subodh Nijsure (also CCed) reported something that might be similar on
> > > ARM, and also reported that setting the foll
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 06:52:10PM +, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> thanks for the reply,
>
> On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> > Interesting. I am assuming that the interrupt in the stack below came
> > from idle, if not, please let me know what.
>
> According to the
Hi Paul,
thanks for the reply,
On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> Interesting. I am assuming that the interrupt in the stack below came
> from idle, if not, please let me know what.
According to the exception stack section in the original traceback, it
appears that the serial inter
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 10:51:30PM +, Paul Walmsley wrote:
>
> Hi Paul
>
> Recently several of us have been seeing "INFO: rcu_sched self-detected
> stall on CPU { 0} (t=20611 jiffies)" stack tracebacks on various OMAP3
> and 4 board.
>
> I only noticed it during v3.6-rc3, but I suspect it's
44 matches
Mail list logo
