On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 04:43:46PM +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> Il 29/01/21 10:14, Matti Vaittinen ha scritto:
Please delete unneeded context from mails when replying. Doing this
makes it much easier to find your reply in the message, helping ensure
it won't be missed by people scro
On Sat, 2021-01-30 at 16:43 +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> Il 29/01/21 10:14, Matti Vaittinen ha scritto:
> > On Thu, 2021-01-28 at 12:10 +, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 09:23:08AM +, Vaittinen, Matti wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2021-01-27 at 16:32 +, Mark Brow
Il 29/01/21 10:14, Matti Vaittinen ha scritto:
On Thu, 2021-01-28 at 12:10 +, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 09:23:08AM +, Vaittinen, Matti wrote:
On Wed, 2021-01-27 at 16:32 +, Mark Brown wrote:
Note that the events the API currently has are expected to be for
the
actu
On Thu, 2021-01-28 at 12:10 +, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 09:23:08AM +, Vaittinen, Matti wrote:
> > On Wed, 2021-01-27 at 16:32 +, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > Note that the events the API currently has are expected to be for
> > > the
> > > actual error conditions, not for
On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 09:23:08AM +, Vaittinen, Matti wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-01-27 at 16:32 +, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Note that the events the API currently has are expected to be for the
> > actual error conditions, not for the warning ones - indicating that
> > the
> > voltage is out of r
On Wed, 2021-01-27 at 16:32 +, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 03:34:46PM +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
> wrote:
> > Il 27/01/21 13:56, Matti Vaittinen ha scritto:
> > > I can only speak for BD9576MUF - which has two limits for
> > > monitored
> > > entity (temperature/voltage)
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 03:34:46PM +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> Il 27/01/21 13:56, Matti Vaittinen ha scritto:
> > I can only speak for BD9576MUF - which has two limits for monitored
> > entity (temperature/voltage). One limit being 'warning' limit (or
> > 'detection' as data-sheet s
On Wed, 2021-01-27 at 15:34 +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> Il 27/01/21 13:56, Matti Vaittinen ha scritto:
> > Hello Mark,
> >
>
> Hey Matti, hey Mark!
>
> > Nice to hear from you. :)
> >
> > On Wed, 2021-01-27 at 12:27 +, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 12:01:55P
Il 27/01/21 13:56, Matti Vaittinen ha scritto:
Hello Mark,
Hey Matti, hey Mark!
Nice to hear from you. :)
On Wed, 2021-01-27 at 12:27 +, Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 12:01:55PM +, Vaittinen, Matti wrote:
Anyways - I was wondering if this is common thing amongst many
Hello Mark,
Nice to hear from you. :)
On Wed, 2021-01-27 at 12:27 +, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 12:01:55PM +, Vaittinen, Matti wrote:
>
> > Anyways - I was wondering if this is common thing amongst many
> > PMICs?
> > If yes - then, perhaps some generally useful regulato
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 12:01:55PM +, Vaittinen, Matti wrote:
> Anyways - I was wondering if this is common thing amongst many PMICs?
> If yes - then, perhaps some generally useful regulator helper could be
> added to help implementing the IRQ disabling + scheduling worker to
> check status an
11 matches
Mail list logo
