Re: softirq bugs in pre2

2001-06-12 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > diff -urN 2.4.4/include/linux/condsched.h lowlat/include/linux/condsched.h > --- 2.4.4/include/linux/condsched.h Thu Jan 1 01:00:00 1970 > +++ lowlat/include/linux/condsched.h Sun Apr 29 18:33:13 2001 > @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ > +#ifndef _LINUX_CONDSCHED_H > +#define _LINUX_CONDSCHED_H > + > +

Re: softirq bugs in pre2

2001-06-11 Thread Andrew Morton
Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Mon, 11 Jun 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > > > Since I mentioned the copy-user latency fixes (even if offtopic with the > > above) this is the URL for trivial merging: > > The copy-user latency fixes only make sense for out-of-line copies. If > we're going to have

Re: softirq bugs in pre2

2001-06-11 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 12:09:03PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > The copy-user latency fixes only make sense for out-of-line copies. If > we're going to have a conditional function call to "schedule()", we do not > want to inline the dang thing any more - we've just destroyed our register > set e

Re: softirq bugs in pre2

2001-06-11 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Mon, 11 Jun 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > Since I mentioned the copy-user latency fixes (even if offtopic with the > above) this is the URL for trivial merging: The copy-user latency fixes only make sense for out-of-line copies. If we're going to have a conditional function call to "sche