On Tue, Jun 12 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 20:15:41 +0200
> Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 12 2007, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 12 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:44:50 +0200 Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 20:15:41 +0200
Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12 2007, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 12 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:44:50 +0200 Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > splice
> > >
> > > btw, I'm staring in prof
On Tue, Jun 12 2007, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:44:50 +0200 Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > splice
> >
> > btw, I'm staring in profound mystification at this:
> >
> > int generic_pipe_buf_steal(struct pipe_inode_info *
On Tue, Jun 12 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:44:50 +0200 Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > splice
>
> btw, I'm staring in profound mystification at this:
>
> int generic_pipe_buf_steal(struct pipe_inode_info *pipe,
> struct pipe_buffer *bu
On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:44:50 +0200 Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> splice
btw, I'm staring in profound mystification at this:
int generic_pipe_buf_steal(struct pipe_inode_info *pipe,
struct pipe_buffer *buf)
{
struct page *page = buf->page;
if
On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:44:50 +0200 Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12 2007, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 14:10 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 12 2007, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 13:31 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > >
> >
On Tue, Jun 12 2007, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 14:10 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 12 2007, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 13:31 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > >
> > > > Would you prefer this change, then? I'd prefer keeping the current code,
> > > >
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 14:10 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12 2007, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 13:31 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >
> > > Would you prefer this change, then? I'd prefer keeping the current code,
> > > unless it's absolutely critical that we call
> > > bal
On Tue, Jun 12 2007, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 13:31 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
>
> > Would you prefer this change, then? I'd prefer keeping the current code,
> > unless it's absolutely critical that we call
> > balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited() for each and every page instead of
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 13:31 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> Would you prefer this change, then? I'd prefer keeping the current code,
> unless it's absolutely critical that we call
> balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited() for each and every page instead of eg
> every 16 pages here.
For that we should call:
On Tue, Jun 12 2007, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12 2007, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 11 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 21:59:15 GMT
> > > Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote:
> > >
> > > > Gitweb:
> > > > http://git.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/lin
On Tue, Jun 12 2007, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 11 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 21:59:15 GMT
> > Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote:
> >
> > > Gitweb:
> > > http://git.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=20d698db67059a63d217030dfd02872
On Mon, Jun 11 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 21:59:15 GMT
> Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote:
>
> > Gitweb:
> > http://git.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=20d698db67059a63d217030dfd02872cb5f88dfb
> > Commit: 20d698db67059a63d217030df
On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 21:59:15 GMT
Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote:
> Gitweb:
> http://git.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=20d698db67059a63d217030dfd02872cb5f88dfb
> Commit: 20d698db67059a63d217030dfd02872cb5f88dfb
> Parent: 17374ff1aa9ce2a0597416a1
14 matches
Mail list logo