On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 10:11:23AM -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:
> Is the functionality provided by drivers/char/gen_rtc.c completely handled
> by the rtc subsystem in drivers/rtc?
they were not designed work parallel at the same. Not sure if there is
ever a valid reason to have both comiled into on
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 15:37:28 -0500
woodys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On ARM genrtc has been arbitrary disabled in Kconfig circa 2.6.19 and
> the change to rtc_cmos it is not 100% transparent (ARM Netwinder, Debian).
> If I want to use a current (Etch) hwclock binary - I need genrtc with
> /dev
2 matches
Mail list logo
