On Mon, 1 Jan 2001, Tony Hoyle wrote:
> I'm intrigued... how did you resolve the 'mem_map_inc_count' and
> 'mem_map_dec_count',
> 'put_module_symbol' and 'get_module_symbol' references?
>
> It's only of academic interest for me now as I've ditched the nvidia -
> not worth the hassle.
>
> Amusingl
Tony Spinillo wrote:
>
> The nvidia kernel module (from www.nvidia.com) has compiled and loaded
> correctly with all test13-pre series up to pre6. I just tried to
> compile and load under pre7.
I'm intrigued... how did you resolve the 'mem_map_inc_count' and
'mem_map_dec_count',
'put_module_symb
Chris Evans wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Dec 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 30 Dec 2000, Steven Cole wrote:
> > >
> > > It looks like 2.4.0-test13-pre7 is a clear winner when running dbench
> > > 48 on my somewhat slow test machine (450 Mhz P-III, 192MB, IDE).
> >
> > This is almost certainly
On Sat, 30 Dec 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Dec 2000, Steven Cole wrote:
> >
> > It looks like 2.4.0-test13-pre7 is a clear winner when running dbench 48
> > on my somewhat slow test machine (450 Mhz P-III, 192MB, IDE).
>
> This is almost certainly purely due to changing (some would
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Dec 2000, Steven Cole wrote:
> >
> > It looks like 2.4.0-test13-pre7 is a clear winner when running dbench 48
> > on my somewhat slow test machine (450 Mhz P-III, 192MB, IDE).
>
> This is almost certainly purely due to changing (some would say "fixing")
> the bd
On Sat, 30 Dec 2000, Steven Cole wrote:
>
> It looks like 2.4.0-test13-pre7 is a clear winner when running dbench 48
> on my somewhat slow test machine (450 Mhz P-III, 192MB, IDE).
This is almost certainly purely due to changing (some would say "fixing")
the bdflush synchronous wait point.
No
It looks like 2.4.0-test13-pre7 is a clear winner when running dbench 48
on my somewhat slow test machine (450 Mhz P-III, 192MB, IDE).
2.2.183.53307 MB/sec (NB=4.41633 MB/sec 35.3307 MBit/sec)
2.2.19-pre3 3.81213 MB/sec (NB=4.76516 MB/sec 38.1213 MBit/sec)
2.4.0-test13
>The LDT fixes in particular fix some potentially random strange behaviour.
>And the alpha memmove() thing was a showstopper bug on alphas.
And the network lockup bug...
--Ray
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Sat, Dec 30, 2000 at 07:54:21PM +, Tony Spinillo wrote:
> The nvidia kernel module (from www.nvidia.com) has compiled and loaded
> correctly with all test13-pre series up to pre6. I just tried to
> compile and load under pre7.
> I got the following:
> nv.c:860:unknown field `unmap
9 matches
Mail list logo