> I found patch from about three years ago that implemented a 32-bit
> version of the x86_64 machine check handler. Do you know of any newer
> attempts?
No.
> However, given the merge of x86, a single implementation should be able
> to handle both the 32-bit and 64-bit cases. I tried to build the
On Tue, 2007-11-13 at 15:15 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Max Asbock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Now that the 32-bit and 64-bit x86 machine check handlers live next to
> > each other a certain asymmetry in functionality is apparent. Notably,
> > the 64-bit machine check handler implements a tim
Max Asbock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Now that the 32-bit and 64-bit x86 machine check handlers live next to
> each other a certain asymmetry in functionality is apparent. Notably,
> the 64-bit machine check handler implements a timer that periodically
> polls for silent machine check errors an
Max Asbock wrote:
Now that the 32-bit and 64-bit x86 machine check handlers live next to
each other a certain asymmetry in functionality is apparent. Notably,
the 64-bit machine check handler implements a timer that periodically
polls for silent machine check errors and makes them accessible to u
4 matches
Mail list logo
