Re: Reasons to merge suspend2.

2007-04-27 Thread Bill Davidsen
John Anthony Kazos Jr. wrote: I didn't read your whole post, it's way too long, but I would like to see your patch in mainline as an option to swsusp. What would make this infeasible? For one thing, Linus said not but yesterday that he doesn't want multiple competing suspend algorithms like

Re: Reasons to merge suspend2.

2007-04-25 Thread Al Boldi
Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! Hi! > > >>I didn't read your whole post, it's way too long, but I would like to > > >> see your patch in mainline as an option to swsusp. What would make > > >> this infeasible? > > > > > >For one thing, Linus said not but yesterday that he doesn't want > > > multiple c

Re: Reasons to merge suspend2.

2007-04-25 Thread William Heimbigner
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007, Pavel Machek wrote: Hi! I didn't read your whole post, it's way too long, but I would like to see your patch in mainline as an option to swsusp. What would make this infeasible? For one thing, Linus said not but yesterday that he doesn't want multiple competing suspend

Re: Reasons to merge suspend2.

2007-04-25 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > >>I didn't read your whole post, it's way too long, but I would like to see > >>your patch in mainline as an option to swsusp. What would make this > >>infeasible? > > > >For one thing, Linus said not but yesterday that he doesn't want multiple > >competing suspend algorithms like this in t

Re: Reasons to merge suspend2.

2007-04-25 Thread William Heimbigner
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007, John Anthony Kazos Jr. wrote: I didn't read your whole post, it's way too long, but I would like to see your patch in mainline as an option to swsusp. What would make this infeasible? For one thing, Linus said not but yesterday that he doesn't want multiple competing susp

Re: Reasons to merge suspend2.

2007-04-25 Thread John Anthony Kazos Jr.
> I didn't read your whole post, it's way too long, but I would like to see > your patch in mainline as an option to swsusp. What would make this > infeasible? For one thing, Linus said not but yesterday that he doesn't want multiple competing suspend algorithms like this in the kernel at once

Re: Reasons to merge suspend2.

2007-04-25 Thread Al Boldi
I didn't read your whole post, it's way too long, but I would like to see your patch in mainline as an option to swsusp. What would make this infeasible? Thanks! -- Al --- Nigel Cunningham wrote: > Hi all. > > I've been working on this email on and off for a while, but since Pavel > raised

Reasons to merge suspend2.

2007-04-24 Thread Nigel Cunningham
Hi all. I've been working on this email on and off for a while, but since Pavel raised the issue again, I thought I should make a concerted effort to finish it... In this email, I'm going to outline the problems with the current design (uswsusp and swsusp) and the ways in which Suspend2 overcomes