Re: Rebased for_next branch in my linux-fs git tree

On Fri, 5 Jul 2013 10:04:37 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > On Thu, 4 Jul 2013 19:43:04 +0200 Jan Kara wrote: > > > > I'm just writing this to let you know that I had to rebase for_next > ^^^ > wrong choice of work, you "chose" to rebase.

Re: Rebased for_next branch in my linux-fs git tree

Hi Jan, On Thu, 4 Jul 2013 19:43:04 +0200 Jan Kara wrote: > > I'm just writing this to let you know that I had to rebase for_next ^^^ wrong choice of work, you "chose" to rebase. :-) > branch in my linux-fs git tree because I've messed up my

Rebased for_next branch in my linux-fs git tree

Hello Stephen, I'm just writing this to let you know that I had to rebase for_next branch in my linux-fs git tree because I've messed up my tree and for_linus & for_next branches contained the same patches but with different commit IDs (fast track fixes). When I pulled for_next into for_linus

Rebased for_next branch in my linux-fs git tree

Hello Stephen, I'm just writing this to let you know that I had to rebase for_next branch in my linux-fs git tree because I've messed up my tree and for_linus for_next branches contained the same patches but with different commit IDs (fast track fixes). When I pulled for_next into for_linus

Re: Rebased for_next branch in my linux-fs git tree

Hi Jan, On Thu, 4 Jul 2013 19:43:04 +0200 Jan Kara j...@suse.cz wrote: I'm just writing this to let you know that I had to rebase for_next ^^^ wrong choice of work, you chose to rebase. :-) branch in my linux-fs git tree because I've messed

Re: Rebased for_next branch in my linux-fs git tree

On Fri, 5 Jul 2013 10:04:37 +1000 Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au wrote: On Thu, 4 Jul 2013 19:43:04 +0200 Jan Kara j...@suse.cz wrote: I'm just writing this to let you know that I had to rebase for_next ^^^ wrong choice of work,