Re: Remarks about sigtestsetmask()

Alan Cox wrote: > > > 1. This function is only used in the poorly maintained ftape driver. > >The usage there isn't appriopriate for modern kernels. > > The ftape driver isnt exactly poorly maintained. Its just not integrated into > 2.3/2.4. Ftape 4.0 is still elsewhere This is wrong,

Re: Remarks about sigtestsetmask()

> 1. This function is only used in the poorly maintained ftape driver. >The usage there isn't appriopriate for modern kernels. The ftape driver isnt exactly poorly maintained. Its just not integrated into 2.3/2.4. Ftape 4.0 is still elsewhere - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Re: Remarks about sigtestsetmask()

1. This function is only used in the poorly maintained ftape driver. The usage there isn't appriopriate for modern kernels. The ftape driver isnt exactly poorly maintained. Its just not integrated into 2.3/2.4. Ftape 4.0 is still elsewhere - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Re: Remarks about sigtestsetmask()

Alan Cox wrote: 1. This function is only used in the poorly maintained ftape driver. The usage there isn't appriopriate for modern kernels. The ftape driver isnt exactly poorly maintained. Its just not integrated into 2.3/2.4. Ftape 4.0 is still elsewhere This is wrong, since last

Remarks about sigtestsetmask()

1. This function is only used in the poorly maintained ftape driver. The usage there isn't appriopriate for modern kernels. 2. This function acts only on the sig set of the current process, so the first parameter should be just a porinter to current, instead of currgen->sigset. So it

Remarks about sigtestsetmask()

1. This function is only used in the poorly maintained ftape driver. The usage there isn't appriopriate for modern kernels. 2. This function acts only on the sig set of the current process, so the first parameter should be just a porinter to current, instead of currgen-sigset. So it