emove Linux/x86 exec domain support
Remove execution domain support
arm: Remove signal translation and exec_domain
arm64: Remove signal translation and exec_domain
blackfin: Autogenerate offsets in struct thread_info
blackfin: Remove exec_domain usage
frv: R
On 04/11/2015 01:47 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
A long time ago there was the idea to support different ABIs on Linux
Such that someone could use for example SCO UNIX binaries on Linux
without emulation. While the linux-abi project existed mostly as
out-of-tree patch it's core component, execut
bviously incomplete and abandoned.
Guenter Roeck (1):
sparc: Fix execution domain removal
Richard Weinberger (25):
arm: Remove RISC OS personality
ia64: Remove Linux/x86 exec domain support
Remove execution domain support
arm: Remove signal translation and exec_
Am 12.04.2015 um 23:56 schrieb Linus Torvalds:
> Richard, I'll do 4.0 today and start merging, but since this is going
> into -next, let's wait a few days to verify that there are no issues,
> and then please send me a "final" pull request mid next weeks or so.
>
> Otherwise I'll probably forget i
On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, 12 Apr 2015 22:57:01 +0200 Richard Weinberger wrote:
>>>
>>> Stephen, can you please add the tree to -next?
>>
>> Added from today. I'll remove it after Linus merges it, OK?
>
> sure.
Richard, I'll do 4.0 today and start m
Stephen,
Am 12.04.2015 um 23:13 schrieb Stephen Rothwell:
> Hi Richard,
>
> On Sun, 12 Apr 2015 22:57:01 +0200 Richard Weinberger wrote:
>>
>> Stephen, can you please add the tree to -next?
>
> Added from today. I'll remove it after Linus merges it, OK?
sure.
Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscr
Hi Richard,
On Sun, 12 Apr 2015 22:57:01 +0200 Richard Weinberger wrote:
>
> Stephen, can you please add the tree to -next?
Added from today. I'll remove it after Linus merges it, OK?
Thanks for adding your subsystem tree as a participant of linux-next. As
you may know, this is not a judgment
):
sparc: Fix execution domain removal
Richard Weinberger (25):
arm: Remove RISC OS personality
ia64: Remove Linux/x86 exec domain support
Remove execution domain support
arm: Remove signal translation and exec_domain
arm64: Remove signal translation and exec_do
On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 10:47:39PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
[ ... ]
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rw/misc.git exec_domain_rip_v1
>
Build results:
total: 121 pass: 121 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
total: 30 pass: 27 fail: 3
Failed tests:
sparc32:
Hi Richard,
On Sun, 12 Apr 2015 09:30:01 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> How about we put it in linux-next for a day or two before it gets
> pulled into your tree just to shake out any obvious compile/conflict
> problems?
For example, this new warning in the arm multi_v7_defconfig build (I
did
Hi Linus,
On Sat, 11 Apr 2015 13:52:21 -0700 Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>
> On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> >
> > The removal will make architecutre specific signal handling easier
> > and there is no need to keep execuction domains as this feature is
> > obviously incom
On Sat, 2015-04-11 at 23:12 +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am 11.04.2015 um 22:52 schrieb Linus Torvalds:
> > On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> >>
> >> The removal will make architecutre specific signal handling easier
> >> and there is no need to keep execuction dom
From: Richard Weinberger
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2015 23:12:47 +0200
> Am 11.04.2015 um 22:52 schrieb Linus Torvalds:
>> On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>>>
>>> The removal will make architecutre specific signal handling easier
>>> and there is no need to keep execuction dom
Am 11.04.2015 um 22:52 schrieb Linus Torvalds:
> On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>>
>> The removal will make architecutre specific signal handling easier
>> and there is no need to keep execuction domains as this feature is
>> obviously incomplete and abandoned
>
> Ack.
Am 11.04.2015 um 23:04 schrieb Al Viro:
> On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 01:52:21PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>>>
>>> The removal will make architecutre specific signal handling easier
>>> and there is no need to keep execuction domains as
On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 01:52:21PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> >
> > The removal will make architecutre specific signal handling easier
> > and there is no need to keep execuction domains as this feature is
> > obviously incomplete an
All users of exec_domain are gone, now we can get rid
of that abandoned feature.
To not break existing userspace we keep a dummy
/proc/execdomains file which will always contain
"0-0 Linux [kernel]".
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger
---
kernel/exec_domain.c | 100 +
[PATCH 01/24] arm: Remove RISC OS personality
[PATCH 02/24] ia64: Remove Linux/x86 exec domain support
[PATCH 03/24] Remove execution domain support
[PATCH 04/24] arm: Remove signal translation and exec_domain
[PATCH 05/24] arm64: Remove signal translation and exec_domain
[PATCH 06/24] blackfin: Aut
On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>
> The removal will make architecutre specific signal handling easier
> and there is no need to keep execuction domains as this feature is
> obviously incomplete and abandoned
Ack. The whole exec domain made some code code pretty inscrut
19 matches
Mail list logo
