On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 01:35:44PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> *renamed*, i.e. does the tools (e2fsck ) use "/lost+found" by name,
> or by inode? As far as I know it always uses the same inode number
e2fsck uses /lost+found by name, not by inode. It will recreate a new
lost+found directory
H. Peter Anvin writes:
> Hello people... the original question was: can lost+found be
> *renamed*, i.e. does the tools (e2fsck ) use "/lost+found" by name,
> or by inode? As far as I know it always uses the same inode number
> (11), but I don't know if that is anywhere enforced.
Bzzt.
On Sun, 28 Jan 2001, Mo McKinlay wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Today, H. Peter Anvin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> > Hello people... the original question was: can lost+found be
> > *renamed*, i.e. does the tools (e2fsck ) use "/lost+found" by name,
> > or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Today, H. Peter Anvin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hello people... the original question was: can lost+found be
> *renamed*, i.e. does the tools (e2fsck ) use "/lost+found" by name,
> or by inode? As far as I know it always uses the same
Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
By author:Thunder from the hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> > A file-system without a lost+found directory is like love without sex.
> You mean, possible but leaving you unsatisfied? Well, I think a file
> system without a
On Friday, January 26, 2001 01:19:49 PM -0500 James Lewis Nance
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FWIW IBM's JFS file system does not have a lost+found directory. I dont
> remember if reiserfs does or not.
>
reiserfsck creates it.
-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On Friday, January 26, 2001 01:19:49 PM -0500 James Lewis Nance
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FWIW IBM's JFS file system does not have a lost+found directory. I dont
remember if reiserfs does or not.
reiserfsck creates it.
-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
Followup to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
By author:Thunder from the hill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
A file-system without a lost+found directory is like love without sex.
You mean, possible but leaving you unsatisfied? Well, I think a file
system without a lost+found is a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Today, H. Peter Anvin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hello people... the original question was: can lost+found be
*renamed*, i.e. does the tools (e2fsck c) use "/lost+found" by name,
or by inode? As far as I know it always uses the same inode
On Sun, 28 Jan 2001, Mo McKinlay wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Today, H. Peter Anvin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hello people... the original question was: can lost+found be
*renamed*, i.e. does the tools (e2fsck c) use "/lost+found" by name,
or by inode?
H. Peter Anvin writes:
Hello people... the original question was: can lost+found be
*renamed*, i.e. does the tools (e2fsck c) use "/lost+found" by name,
or by inode? As far as I know it always uses the same inode number
(11), but I don't know if that is anywhere enforced.
Bzzt. /lost+found
> A file-system without a lost+found directory is like love without sex.
You mean, possible but leaving you unsatisfied? Well, I think a file
system without a lost+found is a lot worse.
Thunder
---
Woah... I did a "cat /boot/vmlinuz >> /dev/audio" - and I think I heard
god...
-
To unsubscribe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> On 01/26/01 01:19 PM James Lewis Nance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> FWIW IBM's JFS file system does not have a lost+found directory. I dont
>> remember if reiserfs does or not.
>
> Actually it does.
>
> From one of my rs/6000's sitting here, with a pretty much
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 06:05:54PM -0200, Rodrigo Barbosa (aka morcego) wrote:
>
> I think JFS indeed doesn't have it. And ReiserFS doesn't too. This
> should be common place for journaling filesystems.
No, it's nothing to do with journaling or not. Even journaling
filesystems can suffer
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 06:05:54PM -0200, Rodrigo Barbosa (aka morcego) wrote:
I think JFS indeed doesn't have it. And ReiserFS doesn't too. This
should be common place for journaling filesystems.
No, it's nothing to do with journaling or not. Even journaling
filesystems can suffer IO
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 01/26/01 01:19 PM James Lewis Nance [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FWIW IBM's JFS file system does not have a lost+found directory. I dont
remember if reiserfs does or not.
Actually it does.
From one of my rs/6000's sitting here, with a pretty much default AIX
A file-system without a lost+found directory is like love without sex.
You mean, possible but leaving you unsatisfied? Well, I think a file
system without a lost+found is a lot worse.
Thunder
---
Woah... I did a "cat /boot/vmlinuz /dev/audio" - and I think I heard
god...
-
To unsubscribe
On 01/26/01 01:19 PM James Lewis Nance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>FWIW IBM's JFS file system does not have a lost+found directory. I dont
>remember if reiserfs does or not.
>Jim
Actually it does.
>From one of my rs/6000's sitting here, with a pretty much default AIX
install:
# uname -a
AIX
alias ls="ls -I "lost+found"'
On Fri, 26 Jan 2001, Mike Harrold wrote:
> >
> >
> > An other maybe too obvious way, could be to :
> >
> > alias ls='ls | grep -v "lost+found"'
>
> This turns multiple column output into one single column.
>
> Regards,
>
> /Mike
-
To unsubscribe from this
On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 01:19:49PM -0500, James Lewis Nance wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 08:49:31AM -0500, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 26 Jan 2001, Rob Kaper wrote:
> > > Is there a way to rename lost+found ?? It bothers me to see it in ls all the
>
> > Get used to it. This is
An other maybe too obvious way, could be to :
alias ls='ls | grep -v "lost+found"'
if you are really annoyed by this tiny thing, which is
IMHO, really the least thing i could be annoyed
of...
This took part on Unix file system design, from the
old days, as mentioned earlier by others.
Also
Rob Kaper writes:
> Is there a way to rename lost+found ?? It bothers me to see it in ls all the
> time because 99.9% of my time it's just useless and I really think
> .lost+found (a hidden file) would make much more sense for daily use. I
> assume this would require some ext2 changes as well as
On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 08:49:31AM -0500, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Jan 2001, Rob Kaper wrote:
> > Is there a way to rename lost+found ?? It bothers me to see it in ls all the
> Get used to it. This is part of the Linux/Unix heritage! A file-system
> without a lost+found directory
On Fri, 26 Jan 2001, Rob Kaper wrote:
> If this is ext2 specific, just say so and I'll find a better list to discuss
> this: (any good ext2 lists available for example?)
>
> Is there a way to rename lost+found ?? It bothers me to see it in ls all the
> time because 99.9% of my time it's just
If this is ext2 specific, just say so and I'll find a better list to discuss
this: (any good ext2 lists available for example?)
Is there a way to rename lost+found ?? It bothers me to see it in ls all the
time because 99.9% of my time it's just useless and I really think
.lost+found (a hidden
If this is ext2 specific, just say so and I'll find a better list to discuss
this: (any good ext2 lists available for example?)
Is there a way to rename lost+found ?? It bothers me to see it in ls all the
time because 99.9% of my time it's just useless and I really think
.lost+found (a hidden
On Fri, 26 Jan 2001, Rob Kaper wrote:
If this is ext2 specific, just say so and I'll find a better list to discuss
this: (any good ext2 lists available for example?)
Is there a way to rename lost+found ?? It bothers me to see it in ls all the
time because 99.9% of my time it's just useless
On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 08:49:31AM -0500, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
On Fri, 26 Jan 2001, Rob Kaper wrote:
Is there a way to rename lost+found ?? It bothers me to see it in ls all the
Get used to it. This is part of the Linux/Unix heritage! A file-system
without a lost+found directory is
An other maybe too obvious way, could be to :
alias ls='ls | grep -v "lost+found"'
if you are really annoyed by this tiny thing, which is
IMHO, really the least thing i could be annoyed
of...
This took part on Unix file system design, from the
old days, as mentioned earlier by others.
Also
On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 01:19:49PM -0500, James Lewis Nance wrote:
On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 08:49:31AM -0500, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
On Fri, 26 Jan 2001, Rob Kaper wrote:
Is there a way to rename lost+found ?? It bothers me to see it in ls all the
Get used to it. This is part of the
alias ls="ls -I "lost+found"'
On Fri, 26 Jan 2001, Mike Harrold wrote:
An other maybe too obvious way, could be to :
alias ls='ls | grep -v "lost+found"'
This turns multiple column output into one single column.
Regards,
/Mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On 01/26/01 01:19 PM James Lewis Nance [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FWIW IBM's JFS file system does not have a lost+found directory. I dont
remember if reiserfs does or not.
Jim
Actually it does.
From one of my rs/6000's sitting here, with a pretty much default AIX
install:
# uname -a
AIX
32 matches
Mail list logo
